Exeter Blue I am here
Well-Known Member
I think getting to 100 points would really shine a light on the issue and make it almost impossible not to give it to Pep.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
adeinchessy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 253
Yes. I wondered how the figures would have looked for this season only.Worth noting they had to use "net spend" in their figures to get the table to show what they wanted.
Also something of a foregone conclusion since Klopp's "net" spend was nowt. If he'd failed to gain a single point he'd still be top of the table. What's the point?
urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,655
The beeb bollocks, has been stretched over 2 seasons otherwise liverpool would have net spend of 10m, plus the trophy bit on side would say something very different for rags chelsea and arse.
If they make.it just this season, take sales out and just spent fees it is
Us £282m
Chesea £236m
Scouse £158m
Rags £145
Spurs £107m
Arse £106m
Makes a big difference to that article
If they make.it just this season, take sales out and just spent fees it is
Us £282m
Chesea £236m
Scouse £158m
Rags £145
Spurs £107m
Arse £106m
Makes a big difference to that article
Last edited:
What a load of tripe that article is, cost per point my arse, its just a way to undermine Pep on the eve of mots. They should do another article titled records broken per spending, then Pep would win hands down because lets face it, none of the others play good enough football to break records.
Football is a multi-billion pound industry and the companies (clubs) involved are desperate to retain and expand their customer base. The media - print, TV or Web-based is where companies can discredit their competition and promote themselves for "free"; an industry like no other. Therefore given the outlandish bigging up of the likes of utd (custis wtf?) and Liverpool, coupled with the downplaying and criticising of city, it would be incredibly naive to think a decent wedge of certain clubs' marketing budgets weren't going towards media outlets. I don't buy into this click bait theory, it's all about retaining fan base and hence revenue.
Also, re the comments sections, fight back and put the c@nts straight!!
Also, re the comments sections, fight back and put the c@nts straight!!
I caught a bit on Talksport about manager of the year, it said Ignoring Pep who is your manager of the year, Then two idiots suggested Rafa and that exponent of anti football at Huddersfield.
What exactly do the media want entertaining football or bus parking shite, I'm confused.
Listened to that for about an hour, people from all over the country phoning in to pick there manager of the season but nobody could pick Pep. Like saying who you think will win the league next season but you can't pick City.
I think getting to 100 points would really shine a light on the issue and make it almost impossible not to give it to Pep.
They've probably already voted
Probably still find a way to award it to Dyche.I think getting to 100 points would really shine a light on the issue and make it almost impossible not to give it to Pep.
laserblue
Well-Known Member
Probably still find a way to award it to Dyche.
Interestingly Pardew and Pulis, who usurped Mancini and Pellegrini for MOTS, were both sacked from the same relegated club this season.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Pep has more chance of winning the Eurovision Song Contest for Catalunya than winning MotS!
- Status
- Not open for further replies.