Media Thread 2017/18

[Jalfraag]

Should be able to opt out paying the licence tax.

Been mulling over whether to fuck it off. If the Mrs didn't insist on having breakfast rag tv on, I would've done.

 

[aguero93:20]

Should be able to opt out paying the licence tax.

Haven't paid it in years over here, it's something like €170 for 2 tv channels and a couple of radio stations, all of which are riddled with ads. Plus, the ****s won't even support our domestic league by televising games. If they want to show ads they should subsist on that income. Stepmother works for the post office and she warns me when the licence inspector is about, I just close the front gate and leave the dogs in the front garden. They don't like strangers.

 

[squirtyflower]

Haven't paid it in years over here, it's something like €170 for 2 tv channels and a couple of radio stations, all of which are riddled with ads. Plus, the ****s won't even support our domestic league by televising games. If they want to show ads they should subsist on that income. Stepmother works for the post office and she warns me when the licence inspector is about, I just close the front gate and leave the dogs in the front garden. They don't like strangers.

I’m moving soon, may do it then

 

[tonea2003]

another slant from our game v dortmund and the dippers v dortmund

bbc headline in the dippers report is defeated bur depleted , but ours its in the small print before it mentions all 16 world cup players not available

i know its just a small thing but its symptomatic of how we differ from the darlings

 

[manimanc]

http://www.skysports.com/football/liverpool-vs-b-dortmund/live/389030
http://www.skysports.com/football/man-city-vs-b-dortmund/report/389029
Hmm I guess we're going to be putting up with unbiased and balanced views again this season.
"Mahrez and Hart appear in city defeat...."
"Relive the action as Liverpool take on Dortmund...."
Quality journalism yet again.

 

[bavarian blue]

another slant from our game v dortmund and the dippers v dortmund

bbc headline in the dippers report is defeated bur depleted , but ours its in the small print before it mentions all 16 world cup players not available

i know its just a small thing but its symptomatic of how we differ from the darlings

Thought exactly the same thing.

 

[tonea2003]

Thought exactly the same thing.

as well it was their 4/5 th game and with a vastly more experienced squad/team

 

[JASR]

another slant from our game v dortmund and the dippers v dortmund

bbc headline in the dippers report is defeated bur depleted , but ours its in the small print before it mentions all 16 world cup players not available

i know its just a small thing but its symptomatic of how we differ from the darlings

What I took away from the bbc reports and the positioning of stories/headlines is that during the liverpool game, United stars unlucky not to have gone to the WC were playing a bit after the Liverpool game in front of a expectant crowd against a good team with the prospect of the future stars showing their skills and scoring goals.

But after the match , they didn’t seem to have played at all, as the match report was far down the list of headlines - and only on the football page.

Presumably a boring, 1 shot on target, pitiful crowd, same old tactics against a team far worse than Stoke (12 points in 19, in a league far away from PL level), captain injured, new signing missing start of season, a few weeks before the start of the season wasn’t worth pushing further up the news agenda.

Still it allowed them to concentrate on ‘did city make a mistake selling sancho’ and ‘Joe Hart is still a good keeper’ type top stories...

Or maybe it’s just me

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Times

"Klopp spending more pragmatism than hypocrisy"

Alyson Rudd.

F**k off!

 

[tonea2003]

Times

"Klopp spending more pragmatism than hypocrisy"

Alyson Rudd.

F**k off!

ha ha never heard such shite, how can breaking 2 world records be pragmatic