Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by Chris in London, 14 Jun 2019.
Tell me that article doesn't mention 'Net Spend' and I'll read it.
Or any article come to think of it that compares City to Liverpool.
Noticed tonight what a class act Gabby Logan is compared to that horrible Cates woman
BBC live text for the Liverpool FA Cup game:
Liverpool 0-0 Shrewsbury
Shaun Whalley's finish is fine, he is not offside but a Shrewsbury player is deemed to be offside in the build-up.
It remains 0-0 and LiVARpool strikes again.
Not always us . . .
If anyone fancies an insight in to what happens when Nick Harris is challenged on an alleged Liverpool criminal act, read the thread starting at this response. Notice that he almost immediately frames this as the doing of “unethical Man City employees” (even though they no longer worked for use when the hacking incidents took place), goes in to an exchange trying to obfuscate Liverpool’s responsibility, then (presumably) reacts badly to being called out on his hypocrisy, and posts many responses, but then subsequently deletes almost all of them later.
I hope you are reading this Nick and can see how farcical this response and your subsequent whitewashing of your involvement was (an act of which you are, ironically, always accusing City). It’s interesting that you have one standard for yourself and a completely different standard for City and its supporters. And you wonder why many question your agenda and objectivity, even beyond BM.
Long time lurker on here but don't post very often.
I had a run in with Harris last night. I challenged him and called him out for calling Blues loons, asked his stance on hacking. Standard responses like above and he has no views on hacking, it was settled in his view, as was FFP but that's back on the agenda eh Nick! Suggested that's because it doesn't fit his agenda and once again we're all conspiracy theorists and loons. Called him a basic hack with a clear and obvious agenda and the poor little lamb got all bent out of shape accusing me of name calling. I referred him back to his 'loon' comments, he refused to comment after that.
I'd encourage all blues to challenge him and the WhatsApp group on Twitter, for so-called professional journalists they have a very strange idea of fair and balanced and it's incredibly worrying just how easily they get rattled when challenged on it.
Media are doing good job at turning blues against the manager. You need only to look at threads on here questioning Pep's 'tinkering' with tactics, players....Good for them media...
He's with the Mail on Sunday now, isn't he?
The 'no view' may just be a rote response dictated by the legal team. Mullock has already pointed out that 'one club' doesn't want the story out.
Does anyone know who owns and runs Liverpool.com? It’s come out of nowhere, it’s got a very slick website, akin to the Liverpool Echo’s, and it’s basically an attack Dog website, constantly attacking City. It’s akin to a Liverpool FC propaganda machine.