Media Thread 2019-20

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by Chris in London, 14 Jun 2019.

  1. slick

    slick

    Joined:
    23 Dec 2009
    Messages:
    281
    Location:
    Salford

    Tell me that article doesn't mention 'Net Spend' and I'll read it.
     
  2. slick

    slick

    Joined:
    23 Dec 2009
    Messages:
    281
    Location:
    Salford
    Or any article come to think of it that compares City to Liverpool.
     
  3. nmc

    nmc

    Joined:
    9 Jan 2006
    Messages:
    13,786
    Location:
    Manchester
    Noticed tonight what a class act Gabby Logan is compared to that horrible Cates woman
     

    ADVERTISEMENT

  4. kenzie115

    kenzie115

    Joined:
    31 May 2009
    Messages:
    6,216
    BBC live text for the Liverpool FA Cup game:

    DISALLOWED GOAL

    Liverpool 0-0 Shrewsbury

    CHALKED OFF!!

    Shaun Whalley's finish is fine, he is not offside but a Shrewsbury player is deemed to be offside in the build-up.

    It remains 0-0 and LiVARpool strikes again.

    Not always us . . .
     
  5. jimharri

    jimharri

    Joined:
    30 Dec 2007
    Messages:
    94,816
    Location:
    The back of beyond
  6. SebastianBlue

    SebastianBlue

    Joined:
    25 Jul 2009
    Messages:
    30,626
    Location:
    Still at Maine Road in my mind.
    If anyone fancies an insight in to what happens when Nick Harris is challenged on an alleged Liverpool criminal act, read the thread starting at this response. Notice that he almost immediately frames this as the doing of “unethical Man City employees” (even though they no longer worked for use when the hacking incidents took place), goes in to an exchange trying to obfuscate Liverpool’s responsibility, then (presumably) reacts badly to being called out on his hypocrisy, and posts many responses, but then subsequently deletes almost all of them later.

    I hope you are reading this Nick and can see how farcical this response and your subsequent whitewashing of your involvement was (an act of which you are, ironically, always accusing City). It’s interesting that you have one standard for yourself and a completely different standard for City and its supporters. And you wonder why many question your agenda and objectivity, even beyond BM.

     
  7. paulron32

    paulron32

    Joined:
    13 Dec 2010
    Messages:
    32
    Long time lurker on here but don't post very often.

    I had a run in with Harris last night. I challenged him and called him out for calling Blues loons, asked his stance on hacking. Standard responses like above and he has no views on hacking, it was settled in his view, as was FFP but that's back on the agenda eh Nick! Suggested that's because it doesn't fit his agenda and once again we're all conspiracy theorists and loons. Called him a basic hack with a clear and obvious agenda and the poor little lamb got all bent out of shape accusing me of name calling. I referred him back to his 'loon' comments, he refused to comment after that.

    I'd encourage all blues to challenge him and the WhatsApp group on Twitter, for so-called professional journalists they have a very strange idea of fair and balanced and it's incredibly worrying just how easily they get rattled when challenged on it.
     
  8. alexmcity

    alexmcity

    Joined:
    1 Aug 2019
    Messages:
    1,271
    Team supported:
    City
    Media are doing good job at turning blues against the manager. You need only to look at threads on here questioning Pep's 'tinkering' with tactics, players....Good for them media...
     
    Last edited: 5 Feb 2020
    CelesteItis, mccity, colblue and 2 others like this.
  9. MillionMilesAway

    MillionMilesAway

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2015
    Messages:
    10,606
    Location:
    London
    He's with the Mail on Sunday now, isn't he?
    The 'no view' may just be a rote response dictated by the legal team. Mullock has already pointed out that 'one club' doesn't want the story out.
     
  10. jrb

    jrb

    Joined:
    8 Oct 2008
    Messages:
    17,210
    Does anyone know who owns and runs Liverpool.com? It’s come out of nowhere, it’s got a very slick website, akin to the Liverpool Echo’s, and it’s basically an attack Dog website, constantly attacking City. It’s akin to a Liverpool FC propaganda machine.
     

Share This Page