Media Thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sky reached a new low for yesterdays biased coverage.

Never heard so much fuss over a yellow card that was not given. If only they were as concerned with the conduct of McTominay, Robertson, Kane, Mané every big match, they might be able to form some sort of excuse for it: Commentary: "He should be off", half time: "he should be off the pitch, City are lucky", they spent ages driving the message across. Then they finally add a bit of balance to cover their backs in commentary during the second half (and post match), with a passing comment of: "Would he have made the second foul if he got a yellow for the first one?" As if that shouldn't have been the immediate reply to Neville in commentary and at half time. They had to say it at full time, considering how Laporte managed the second half and his comments at full time about knowing he needed to be more careful because of the yellow card. Although, it was like they were admitting it through gritted teeth.

That all felt very deliberate to me, even though Spurs should have been the whipping boys, due to their FULL involvement in the ESL plans, it appears as though Sly aren't even going to attempt to hide their agenda anymore. The only thing Spurs got was what seemed like a slip up from Tyler by referring to City as a big club as if they are not, which Neville was quick to correct with: "I thought Spurs were a big club". Made me laugh that, probably cost him his bonus.

As for Redknapp's no history comment after the game, why didn't Micha interrupt with a quick-jokey: "You wouldn't be saying that if Summerbee was in the room Jamie. In fact, I think he's probably here today, shall I text him? He wont mind popping on for a bit".
 
Last edited:
Sky reached a new low for yesterdays biased coverage.

Never heard so much fuss over a yellow card that was not given. If only they were as concerned with the conduct of McTominay, Robertson, Kane, Mané every big match, they might be able to form some sort of excuse for it: Commentary: "He should be off", half time: "he should be off the pitch, City are lucky", they spent ages driving the message across. Then they finally add a bit of balance to cover their backs in commentary during the second half (and post match), with a passing comment of: "Would he have made the second foul if he got a yellow for the first one?" As if that shouldn't have been the immediate reply to Neville in commentary and at half time. They had to say it at full time, considering how Laporte managed the second half and his comments at full time about knowing he needed to be more careful because of the yellow card. Although, it was like they were admitting it through gritted teeth.

That all felt very deliberate to me, even though Spurs should have been the whipping boys, due to their FULL involvement in the ESL plans, it appears as though Sly aren't even going to attempt to hide their agenda anymore. The only thing Spurs got was what seemed like a slip up from Tyler by referring to City as a big club as if they are not, which Neville was quick to correct with: "I thought Spurs were a big club". Made me laugh that, probably cost him his bonus.

As for Redknapp's no history comment after the game, why didn't Micha interrupt with a quick-jokey: "You wouldn't be saying that if Summerbee was in the room Jamie. In fact, I think he's probably here today, shall I text him? He wont mind popping on for a bit".
A 2 year old could have told them that if Laporte got a yellow for the first incident everything that happened from that moment in time would be different. Simple basic logic. Same illogical thinking peddled in the press.
 
A 2 year old could have told them that if Laporte got a yellow for the first incident everything that happened from that moment in time would be different. Simple basic logic. Same illogical thinking peddled in the press.
How many fouls did he commit after his actual yellow? Not really difficult is it but they just want to create a nothing story.
 
Not a peep from them about Spurs fullback still being on the pitch. The foul on Phil, early on, was worth a red on its own let alone the further fouls on Kevin. One rule for us etc..that's where the bias is clear and obvious. Have to admit though, I had the commentary turned right down as usual.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.