Hopefully not the United kit homage on the phone caseBrings to mind the old saying......."slack as a horses collar", err although there is still something appealing about that image.
Hopefully not the United kit homage on the phone caseBrings to mind the old saying......."slack as a horses collar", err although there is still something appealing about that image.
Theres a phone??????Hopefully not the United kit homage on the phone case
Just sums the BBC and Stone up.
Our report. Has to mention 40 million Ake. Fodens 1st game since being sent home in disgrace (our 1st game of course so of course its his 1st game)
Utd Report. On his debut, Donny van de Beek pulled one back (no reference of course about his 40 million signing) and no mention of being sent home in disgrace re Greenwood when mentioned in the report.
1 Reporter, 2 identical incidents, both 40 million fees, both sent home from England, 1 team both mentioned, 1 team nothing. Why have we not banned this clickbait Rag from the ground yet?
Just sums the BBC and Stone up.
Our report. Has to mention 40 million Ake. Fodens 1st game since being sent home in disgrace (our 1st game of course so of course its his 1st game)
Utd Report. On his debut, Donny van de Beek pulled one back (no reference of course about his 40 million signing) and no mention of being sent home in disgrace re Greenwood when mentioned in the report.
1 Reporter, 2 identical incidents, both 40 million fees, both sent home from England, 1 team both mentioned, 1 team nothing. Why have we not banned this clickbait Rag from the ground yet?
Not a huge fan of Simon Stone but based on what you had written I decided to check out both articles.
With regards Beek and Ake the two mentions of them, and I quote
‘And new £40 million pound centre back Nathan Ake showed his class’
in comparison to
‘Van der beek pulled one back, 10 minutes before time, but Zaha struck again against his former club to secure a deserved victory for Palace’
With regards the Iceland incident the City articles focuses around KDBs and Fodens performance where as Greenwood performance does not even elicit a mention, hence Iceland was mentioned in relation to Foden.
The two article could not have been any more different with praise given to City for their performance and the opposite for United for theirs. Absolutely nothing to moan at within those two reports
I feel that poster set you up for an easy goal. You are of course right with that assessment. Not much inherently wrong there.
You say you are not a fan of Simon Stone, but do you think he is a sports journalist who treats the two Manchester clubs equally, with no historical bias ?
This is exactly the kind of knob who needs to turn up at the campus and be shown where the fuckin' bus stop back to PIccadilly is! If we let them in and they write shite, they will still write the shite but we won't be feeding them and letting them in!Just sums the BBC and Stone up.
Our report. Has to mention 40 million Ake. Fodens 1st game since being sent home in disgrace (our 1st game of course so of course its his 1st game)
Utd Report. On his debut, Donny van de Beek pulled one back (no reference of course about his 40 million signing) and no mention of being sent home in disgrace re Greenwood when mentioned in the report.
1 Reporter, 2 identical incidents, both 40 million fees, both sent home from England, 1 team both mentioned, 1 team nothing. Why have we not banned this clickbait Rag from the ground yet?
Not a huge fan of Simon Stone but based on what you had written I decided to check out both articles.
With regards Beek and Ake the two mentions of them, and I quote
‘And new £40 million pound centre back Nathan Ake showed his class’
in comparison to
‘Van der beek pulled one back, 10 minutes before time, but Zaha struck again against his former club to secure a deserved victory for Palace’
With regards the Iceland incident the City articles focuses around KDBs and Fodens performance where as Greenwood performance does not even elicit a mention, hence Iceland was mentioned in relation to Foden.
The two article could not have been any more different with praise given to City for their performance and the opposite for United for theirs. Cannot see anything to complain about within those two reports