Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
You do realise our owners have already been targeted don't you?

Daily, weekly and monthly, much more when we win the league or a cup.

I can't see what the journalists over here have missed to target our owners.
We've had...
State run.
Oil money.
Sportswashing.
Blood on our hands.
Financial doping.
The war in Yemen.
Human rights abuse.
Ruining football.
Buying leagues.
Altering emails.
Cooking the books.
Lying about sponsorship deals.


Have I missed anything?
No no no no no. Not lying about sponsorships.

What we’ve done is inflate them for getting round ffp, whilst at the same time undercutting them to stop them sponsoring our rivals

Really impressive business model to inflate & undercut at the same time. Not sure how we’ve done both as I didn’t think that would be possible, but I’m not a narcissistic journalist, so what would I know?
 
Researchers, read David Yallop's book on Carlos the Jackel.
What is that in relation to sorry? Terrorism in general or a specific case?

I think I get it but Iran are accused multiple involvements same as Saudi. Also, who's to say the researcher is right? Or Calos' word can be trusted? The point was propaganda from all sides is rife, people can be bought and paid too to add to that, so we all filter what we can and form opinions based on what we think makes the most sense.
 
Last edited:
What is that in relation to sorry? Terrorism in general or a specific case? Iran are accused multiple involvements same as Saudi. Also, who's to say the researcher is right? The point was people can be bought and paid, propaganda from all sides is rife, so we all form opinions based on what we think makes the most sense.
It shows how misinformation can be regurgitated so many times that respected commentators who don't check facts repeat and repeat the information so that eventually the sheep treat it as fact.
 
Our official website is Man city so I can't see the issue with MAN or MANCHESTER. I do agree that the Rags are C-NTS though. CTID
I don’t see the website name as the issue, in the same sentence it’s Manchester united and Man City, and since when was u before C in the alphabet. We fortunately agree about the cunts!
 
"Man City" doesn't really bother me like it does some, because all PL Clubs have brands to be fair. However, "If City doesn't get referenced by the name Manchester, nobody does" is kind of the point though.

United haven't been based in Manchester for over 100 years, they've been referred to as Man-U globally a lot longer too.
My experience is that the word “Manchester” has been synonymous with “United” for my entire life. Indeed, traveling the world, the mere mention of being from Manchester elicits “Manchester United.”

In fact, in the pre-Mansour era, because of the way most teams are based on the name of their town, the word “Manchester” actually MEANT “Manchester United”!

CFG is a branding effort to secure the word “City” for us is, in my opinion, BECAUSE of the above fact.

It is much easier to say “City” in any language on earth than the whole thing, especially when you would have to overcome the years of “Manchester” being associated with the Rags.

As foreign owners, I think management understands this friction and seeks to avoid it, while creating a new narrative.

I don’t think it is coincidence that the East Stand (directly opposite the TV cameras!!!) is now emblazoned with “CITY” or that “City” is being used on leisurewear.

Yes, it is painful for Manchester locals to think of their home town as associated with the Rags, but outside of a 60 mile radius of Piccadilly, no-one really cares about us making the “they’re not even in Manchester” reference!

Sadly, when football blew up on satellite TV and then internet cable, United were on top and we were doing the roundtrip through the Leagues. That isn’t going to change with time, so why spend precious money and effort trying to change it?

We are always going to be Man City, with the “City” part being the defining characteristic, so why not promote that?

It was clear from the outset of the Holding Company being named that the GLOBAL project was about helping make the team name “City” synonymous with Man City as the halo club, but in also (wherever and whenever feasible) having CFG clubs carry that name and wear the sky blue…which is yet another branding effort.

The hope is that when the word “City” or the sky blue shirt colour is seen on a team, the footballing public THINKS Man City/CFG.

If we can accomplish that, commercial contracts become ever more valuable and the global football “istree” of “Manchester” being synonymous with the Rags becomes ever more irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
My experience is that the word “Manchester” has been synonymous with “United” for my entire life. Indeed, traveling the world, the mere mention of being from Manchester elicits “Manchester United.”

In fact, in the pre-Mansour era, because of the way most teams are based on the name of their town, the word “Manchester” actually MEANT “Manchester United”!

CFG is a branding effort to secure the word “City” for us is, in my opinion, BECAUSE of the above fact.

It is much easier to say “City” in any language on earth than the whole thing, especially when you would have to overcome the tears of “Manchester” being associated with the Rags.

As foreign owners, I think management understands this friction and seeks to avoid it, while creating a new narrative.

I don’t think it is coincidence that the East Stand (directly opposite the TV cameras!!!) is now emblazoned with “CITY” or that “City” is being used on leisurewear.

Yes, it is painful for Manchester locals to think of their home town as associated with the Rags, but outside of a 60 mile radius of Piccadilly, no-one really cares about us making the “they’re not even in Manchester” reference!

Sadly, when football blew up on satellite TV and then internet cable, United were on top and we were doing the roundtrip through the Leagues. That isn’t going to change with time, so why spend precious money and effort trying to change it?

We are always going to be Man City, with the “City” part being the defining characteristic, so why not promote that.

It was clear from the outset of the Holding Company being named that the GLOBAL project was about helping make the team name “City” synonymous with Man City as the halo club, but in also (wherever and whenever feasible) having CFG clubs carry that name and wear the sky blue…which is yet another branding effort.

The hope is that when the word “City” or the sky blue shirt colour is seen on a team, the footballing public THINKS Man City/CFG.

If we can accomplish that, commercial contracts become ever more valuable and the global football “istree” of “Manchester” being synonymous with the Rags becomes ever more irrelevant.
It's still our job as City fans to inform the masses that they aren't even from Manchester though. :)
 
You do realise our owners have already been targeted don't you?

Daily, weekly and monthly, much more when we win the league or a cup.

I can't see what the journalists over here have missed to target our owners.
We've had...
State run.
Oil money.
Sportswashing.
Blood on our hands.
Financial doping.
The war in Yemen.
Human rights abuse.
Ruining football.
Buying leagues.
Altering emails.
Cooking the books.
Lying about sponsorship deals.


Have I missed anything?
Weaponising fans against ‘journalists’
 
What we’ve done is inflate them for getting round ffp, whilst at the same time undercutting them to stop them sponsoring our rivals

Really impressive business model to inflate & undercut at the same time. Not sure how we’ve done both

Don't beat yourself up, only a genius like Simon Jordan fully understands it.

tumblr_mgf934WkTF1rf995wo1_400.gif

5c6f7d0c0675d5808b899240ef3d28a0aceaac84.gifv

rubiks-cube.gif
 
You do realise our owners have already been targeted don't you?

Daily, weekly and monthly, much more when we win the league or a cup.

I can't see what the journalists over here have missed to target our owners.
We've had...
State run.
Oil money.
Sportswashing.
Blood on our hands.
Financial doping.
The war in Yemen.
Human rights abuse.
Ruining football.
Buying leagues.
Altering emails.
Cooking the books.
Lying about sponsorship deals.


Have I missed anything?
It wouldn’t surprise me, if they printed it was us who gave Kurt Zouma the kitten to kick!
 
You do realise our owners have already been targeted don't you?

Daily, weekly and monthly, much more when we win the league or a cup.

I can't see what the journalists over here have missed to target our owners.
We've had...
State run.
Oil money.
Sportswashing.
Blood on our hands.
Financial doping.
The war in Yemen.
Human rights abuse.
Ruining football.
Buying leagues.
Altering emails.
Cooking the books.
Lying about sponsorship deals.


Have I missed anything?
Aqueducts?

;-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.