Is it the owner who hasn’t taken money out if the club hmmm.
There's a great big picture of the Sheikh and Khaldoon at the Etihad to go with it so there's no need to guess.
Is it the owner who hasn’t taken money out if the club hmmm.
Oliver, what are you claiming our owners are greedy for? Money or TrophiesYet another one. Guess who's picture accompanies the article? No prizes as the answer is too obvious.
OLIVER HOLT: Greedy owners have insulted us for too long and we can't trust them any more... money-driven Premier League executives don't get it so it is time for an independent regulator
Oliver, what are you claiming our owners are greedy for? Money or Trophies
If it is the first,I am pretty sure you are very wide of the mark, could you provide how much they have taken out of the club against what they have invested. If it is the second probably guilty as charged.But surely all clubs are 'greedy' for trophies, as many of your ilk laud the achievements of 'the established teams' when they have dominated the English trophies. Why is it OK for scum, dippers and tarquins to win many trophies and not others.
Have you and others ever considered how teams found success in the 30's through 90's , was it all through the spirit of amateurism, luck, or a bloody good show. Probably not. Most probably through investment of money, which brings good facilities, wages, structure and therefore the better players.
What you seem to not like is the dismantling of the status quo, a changing of the guardnso to speak, tbh I don't know of any registered legitimate business in any other market place, where investment and success is seen as a negative.
And in other news water is wet.The mail on Sunday are have 2 articles that have a right dig at City.
in the liquid phaseAnd in other news water is wet.
He's FairSquare now and has been for a while.
Rabin delved into the reasons McG left HRW. Based on Rabin's epic thread McG was fos and partial to a pork pie.
Well worth click and a re-read:
And I notice the rags average net transfer spend is 46m less than city's, absolute bs. That **** Harris has just made all this article up, supposedly a fan opinion, what an utter bellendI see the results of Harris’s confirmation bias survey are in (not gonna post a link to the cnut’s article). Unsurprisingly, questions along the lines of “would you like to see the evil, baby killing monsters, who own dirty cheating Manchester City, thrown out of football”, have been firmly endorsed by supporters of the rags and the dippers, who absolutely haven’t got a hat in the ring of any description. The man’s an utter fucking prick
Whether the headline is right or wrong, what has it got to do with our club ? The man is a tool.Yet another one. Guess who's picture accompanies the article? No prizes as the answer is too obvious.
OLIVER HOLT: Greedy owners have insulted us for too long and we can't trust them any more... money-driven Premier League executives don't get it so it is time for an independent regulator
He's FairSquare now and has been for a while.
Rabin delved into the reasons McG left HRW. Based on Rabin's epic thread McG was fos and partial to a pork pie.
Well worth click and a re-read: