unexpected item
Well-Known Member
The only thing the Sheikh has damaged is the red teams' trophy count.
I would indeed laugh if many posters on also had a Damascene conversion to the New Socialist Daily Mail. ;)You have to laugh at the Mail's Damascene conversion to socialist principles as soon as it's not the establishment clubs winning everything. Let's look at Holt's rationale for imposing an independent regulator on football;
"After everything that has happened in the past 18 months — the car crash of Project Big Picture, the backlash against the aborted European Super League, the shame of the approval of the Saudi Arabia bid for Newcastle United and the defrocking of Roman Abramovich at Chelsea — no one trusts them to run football any more"
What exactly has happened ? "Project Big Picture" ? In case, like Oliver Holt, you've forgotten;
"The plan, put together by Liverpool and Manchester United, would see teams in the EFL - ie the leagues below the Premier League - given £250m ($325m) right now, to share between themselves, plus 25% of revenue from future TV deals that the Premier League secures.
Those clubs, led by the EFL's chair Rick Parry, have been demanding money from the Premier League for some time, because they have been struggling financially in the absence of crowds due to Covid-19" -Ah..Liverpool and Manchester United.
European Super League ? In case, like Oliver Holt, you've forgotten;
"Barcelona president Joan Laporta has slammed Manchester United and Liverpool by accusing the Premier League duo of being the 'real founders' of the failed European Super League.
All three of the clubs were intended to be founding members of the failed ESL when it was initially announced back in April with United co-owner Joel Glazer one of the figures who publicly endorsed the controversial plans"
"The shame of the approval of the Saudi Arabia bid for Newcastle United" ? In case, like Oliver Holt, you have forgotten who was behind the appointment of the Premier League's chief decision maker;
"Liverpool and Manchester United have left their Premier League rivals furious after reportedly having had special access to weigh up the candidates to be the new chief executive of the Premier League.
The two English giants met with candidates for the position, which had initially been taken up by Susanna Dinnage before the Animal Planet president pulled out of the appointment"
Which just leaves Abramovic. Maybe Holt criticised him and called him out before Putin's invasion of Ukraine but, if so, I can't find it. And, even so, who, at the proposed regulator's office will decide which wars are acceptable to football and which aren't. Who at the Regulator's will decide how close a person needs to be to another person to be deemed sufficiently responsible for that other person's actions ? One thing's certain. It can't and won't be someone independent.
In short, Oliver Holt isn't stupid enough not to know all that. The guy is, simply, a ****.
Surely that cannot apply to us, our exec’s aren’t greedy don’t take money out.Yet another one. Guess who's picture accompanies the article? No prizes as the answer is too obvious.
OLIVER HOLT: Greedy owners have insulted us for too long and we can't trust them any more... money-driven Premier League executives don't get it so it is time for an independent regulator
so the survey goes from 10k-11k to 100k in the blink of eyeHarris, City washing, continues
And the headline article.
It’s a miracle!
You just watch the narrative and agenda explode the closer it get’s to playing the Scousers twice.
so the survey goes from 10k-11k to 100k in the blink of eye
He certainly needs Ghosting the fuckin shitbagRoan using one of these was he ?
I think nick should be congratulated for some excellent journalism. Bound to win loads of awardsNick Harris's article is the utter piece of shit we knew it would be when he published the questions. They were manifestly designed to produce the answers he wanted.
Anyway, let's remember that we know he reads this forum. And let's also bear in mind that he had one of his occasional pathetic tantrums the last time it was mentioned on here. So let's give ourselves a little reminder here:
THE HIGH COURT DECLINED TO VIEW NICK HARRIS AS AN EXPERT WITNESS. In other words, Nick, the judge had the same view of your level of expertise that we do on here, in common with anyone else who has an IQ of above 80 - it's absolutely fucking non-existent.