And the funny thing about Harris's somewhat desperate plea is that I understand at one stage, City considered him a reputable journalist as part of their media strategy and shared quite a lot with him. Yet he turned against us for some unknown reason so was excluded from the 'magic circle' who City felt were sensible and responsible journalists and who they were prepared to trust.
I find it mad that City ever considered him anything but a very run of the mill, average sports journalist.
Let's take a look @ his last two exclusives in the Daily Mail as an example:
- Another 'smoking gun' hacked email
- A piece built around an opinion poll
The first one around another 'smoking gun' email has already been done to death, namely by Der Speigel. Any credible person with experience on this matter would of told him that an email alone is not enough to lead to any sort of serious sanction being levied. It is what is acted upon, with relevant financial transactions following, proving said email was acted upon that would lead to such. The fact he chose to go with the angle he did shows he is more interested in sensationalist headlines, that generate clicks from legions of United & Liverpool fans.
The second one, in a similar vain to the above, was a piece written on the back of a survey that was quite clearly tainted with confirmation bias. Anyone who took the time to look at it could see what his final piece would look like, this is far from good journalism. In what world Twitter would ever constitute a good platform for information gathering on a subject like football club ownership, I don't know, but alas, he claims the key issue for fans on his survey is the appliance of FFP. He then negates to mention that Leicester City were charged by the EFL for failing it before promotion to the PL, Wolves are currently in a 2 year settlement with UEFA for failing it & Liverpool also failed it before qualifying for European competition again. In another angle he claims City's to be the most damaging ownership model in the eyes of other fans, but yet the 5th most admired? He then claims a City fan said a detractor of Sheikh Mansour's ownership was that we had 'cheated' which is quite clearly nonsense.
Some other side notes I've observed from him include, his view that City not appealing the CAS fine is evidence of their guilt. When pointed out to him this was for none cooperation with UEFA's investigation, rather than the charges themselves, he dismisses it. His referring to City fans who do not share his view that City have cheated FFP in derogatory terms, his breakdown of City relying on £1.7b of UAE sponsorship money over the last 10 years, dismissed by our own audited accounts. I could go on.
Carl Bernstein he is not.