MEN - United have "embarrassed" City over academy graduates

[blue by birth]

Samuel Fuckhurst is another sad rag twat who cant stand the fact that we are far and away the better team and will only get better.

Its easier to play kids in meaningless matches but all our games are important so thats why the scum can blood young players who are all inevitably the new Best*,Cantona*,Ronaldo*.......*delete as applicable.

 

[uwe rosler 28]

As long as they don't embarrass us on the pitch then I couldn't give a shit.

 

[manchester blue]

Why are United fans such boring ****s. Every comments section goes on about 20,000 empty seats every week when the games have all sold out and they fail to see the irony that full stands have been closed for all their tin pot cup games. They really do epitomise dickhead.

 

[Bill]

is anybody actually surprised?
MUEN....simples.

 

[bluwes]

Samuel Fuckhurst is another sad rag twat who cant stand the fact that we are far and away the better team and will only get better.

Its easier to play kids in meaningless matches but all our games are important so thats why the scum can blood young players who are all inevitably the new Best*,Cantona*,Ronaldo*.......*delete as applicable.

This latest one is the new Iniesta apparently

 

[The Riot Club]

Is anyone embarassed?


Thought not.

I'd be more embarassed only scoring about 42 goals in a whole season and having an egotistical gobshite as manager and a fat granny shagging rughead as captain.

And of course, their academy being so good, they don't need to spend £90m on the new Carlton Palmer.

 

[It could have been 10]

For any youngster to get a chance in the City first team they have got to be virtually on a par with Silva, Aguero, De Bruyne, Sterling, Sane, Ya Ya, Kompany etc.. the bar is much, much higher. They have to be of a much higher standard & quality than the likes of Lingard, Cleverley, Harrop, Wellbeck, etc,

 

[BillCarlisle]

I remember as a kid back in the 1950's my Dad used to reckon that the MEN was a United paper whilst the Manchester Evening Chronicle leaned towards City. That's why he read the 'Chron' and only read the 'News' when City had beaten the Rags.
After the Chronicle disappeared we only had the Evening News left and had to put up with David Meek's at times embarrassing bias about the Rags whilst Peter Gardner's coverage of City was generally much less. Even in the late 60's & early 70's when we were undisputed top dogs in Manchester.

History is repeating itself, with City again finishing above the Rags in the League yet the paper only seems interested in publishing bile and aiming it towards an Owner who has pumped millions into Manchester's economy. Unlike of course the Glazers. Little seems to have changed at the MEN. A local rag printed for local Rags. Pathetic really.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

I am highly embarrassed that our MCWFC didn't achieve anything like the MANUre Ladies, and whenever our Academy lads had a Raggy fixture we got the most embarrassing battering you could imagine. What does deluded mean, again?

 

[ancoats]

the manchester evening news is so good they can not give it away in town on thursday friday and saturday
but i find it pretty good for lighting the barbecue and loads of other stuff other than reading it and any of our younger city fans please take care when lighting paper shit burns