abu13
Well-Known Member
Things never end well on an Israel thread, i'll give it 30 minutes before it all kicks off on here :)
Do you think it's acceptable to storm a country's border, throwing molotovs at the guards?
The UNHRC chief is in the title of the thread. I think it’s legitimate to discuss that organisation here.But this thread is abt Israel and the state murdering Palistainians. I was told to start a thread on this as to not derail others.
Clever boy.That's the spirit, answer a question with a question, genius mate. My dad's bigger than your dad etc etc etc
No to your question, by the way.
I would would say there's better ways at dealing with it than live ammunition.OK.
Is shooting people who are throwing petrol bombs at you permissible?
Things never end well on an Israel thread, i'll give it 30 minutes before it all kicks off on here :)
Clever boy.
So, if it's not acceptable, why question what happens if you do?
That's another question by the way, and my dad's no longer with us, although he was 6 foot three, so quite possibly.
How would you have handled this situation?I would would say there's better ways at dealing with it than live ammunition.
I've looked at every other football forum and they all have a debate on this topic. If it turns to abuse isn't the new policy thread bans?
Instead of questioning my debating skills, why don't you answer the original question?Answering a question with a question is a very poor debating tool and not normally worth a response. It adds nothing to a debate and sounds childish.
You should have at least answered the initial question.
Maybe throw some petrol bombs back?I would would say there's better ways at dealing with it than live ammunition.
Perhaps they should try saying "I say old chap. Would you mind frightfully not throwing those bottle things. They make an awful mess." That'd do it.I would would say there's better ways at dealing with it than live ammunition.
Fireproof gear, riot shields, batons and handcuffs. Which is exactly how European police forces would deal with it. They'd be criticised for using the batons on minors as well.I would would say there's better ways at dealing with it than live ammunition.
But it's not a European police force dealing with a night of civil disturbance is it? It's an army protecting its border against a group of terrorists who want to wipe their country off the map.Fireproof gear, riot shields, batons and handcuffs. Which is exactly how European police forces would deal with it. They'd be criticised for using the batons on minors as well.
Sums it up and the UNHRC are there to automatically go along with it.So the Palestinians were using their own kids as human shield with a 2 prong objective, throwing petrol bombs at Israeli soldiers using the kids in the hope that the soldiers wouldn’t shoot at them and then screaming murderers when they do shoot at them
That's about the strength of it.So the Palestinians were using their own kids as human shield with a 2 prong objective, throwing petrol bombs at Israeli soldiers using the kids in the hope that the soldiers wouldn’t shoot at them and then screaming murderers when they do shoot at them
We should contract the Israeli Defence Forces to do security for the coach the next visit to Klanfield.
Maybe the kids had been bad (not made their bed, talked back to their mum, used a swear word at school), and that's the Palestinian equivalent of the "naughty step"........??The cunts shouldn’t be putting their kids in harms way total cowards trick
Maybe the kids had been bad (not made their bed, talked back to their mum, used a swear word at school), and that's the Palestinian equivalent of the "naughty step"........??