Middle East Conflict | Israel launches attack on Iran

Things never end well on an Israel thread, i'll give it 30 minutes before it all kicks off on here :)
 
That's the spirit, answer a question with a question, genius mate. My dad's bigger than your dad etc etc etc

No to your question, by the way.
Clever boy.
So, if it's not acceptable, why question what happens if you do?
That's another question by the way, and my dad's no longer with us, although he was 6 foot three, so quite possibly.
 
OK.
Is shooting people who are throwing petrol bombs at you permissible?
I would would say there's better ways at dealing with it than live ammunition.
Things never end well on an Israel thread, i'll give it 30 minutes before it all kicks off on here :)

I've looked at every other football forum and they all have a debate on this topic. If it turns to abuse isn't the new policy thread bans?
 
Clever boy.
So, if it's not acceptable, why question what happens if you do?
That's another question by the way, and my dad's no longer with us, although he was 6 foot three, so quite possibly.

Answering a question with a question is a very poor debating tool and not normally worth a response. It adds nothing to a debate and sounds childish.

You should have at least answered the initial question.
 
I would would say there's better ways at dealing with it than live ammunition.


I've looked at every other football forum and they all have a debate on this topic. If it turns to abuse isn't the new policy thread bans?
How would you have handled this situation?
What if soldiers were frantically avoiding getting burned to death?
It's very easy to scream about murderers and the like, to enforce an anti Israel agenda, but dissection of the
facts involved sometimes makes that stance look ridiculous.
 
Answering a question with a question is a very poor debating tool and not normally worth a response. It adds nothing to a debate and sounds childish.

You should have at least answered the initial question.
Instead of questioning my debating skills, why don't you answer the original question?
For what it's worth, my answer to it is yes, I'd shoot anyone who was about to throw a bottle of petrol with a burning
rag in it at me.
 
I would would say there's better ways at dealing with it than live ammunition.
Fireproof gear, riot shields, batons and handcuffs. Which is exactly how European police forces would deal with it. They'd be criticised for using the batons on minors as well.
 
So the Palestinians were using their own kids as human shield with a 2 prong objective, throwing petrol bombs at Israeli soldiers using the kids in the hope that the soldiers wouldn’t shoot at them and then screaming murderers when they do shoot at them
 
Fireproof gear, riot shields, batons and handcuffs. Which is exactly how European police forces would deal with it. They'd be criticised for using the batons on minors as well.
But it's not a European police force dealing with a night of civil disturbance is it? It's an army protecting its border against a group of terrorists who want to wipe their country off the map.
 
So the Palestinians were using their own kids as human shield with a 2 prong objective, throwing petrol bombs at Israeli soldiers using the kids in the hope that the soldiers wouldn’t shoot at them and then screaming murderers when they do shoot at them
Sums it up and the UNHRC are there to automatically go along with it.
 
So the Palestinians were using their own kids as human shield with a 2 prong objective, throwing petrol bombs at Israeli soldiers using the kids in the hope that the soldiers wouldn’t shoot at them and then screaming murderers when they do shoot at them
That's about the strength of it.
 
The cunts shouldn’t be putting their kids in harms way total cowards trick
Maybe the kids had been bad (not made their bed, talked back to their mum, used a swear word at school), and that's the Palestinian equivalent of the "naughty step"........??
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top