Middle East Conflict | Netanyahu orders strikes on Gaza (p1161)

As far as I can see they're making targeted attacks on the regime and it's nuclear program. Don't tell me you'd be happy for the mad mullahs to have nuclear weapons, world war 3 would be around the corner.
Mad fucking Vlad, Donald and that fat little **** in NK have them and haven’t used them on anyone, there’s a fucking reason why.

It’s all bollocks, as already pointed out Iran has been on the brink of the nuclear bond since the 80’s according to Israel. It’s the go to excuse for bombing them, same as in Gaza every hospital or school is a Hamas control centre.
 
Whilst the concept of MAD relies on rational thinking the practice does not, because it requires, alongside a belief that all parties would rationally believe nuclear war is catastrophic, a belief in the infallibility of the system and no system is infallible. Past performance is no guarantee of future success. Rationality is also in the eye of the beholder.
Exactly that, for some in the Iranian theocracy , nuclear war is not catastrophic, their rationality is not ours .

Look up Shia Twelverism and it’s eschatology.
 
S
Listen to the updates Israel hit terrorist bases and bombed uranium enrichment sites
Civilian areas were not hit except for terrorist leaders, they hit the 15th floor only so as not to hit the guards, this is an attack aimed at hitting terrorism only, a big difference, because we have a very big common denominator with the citizens of Tehran, all of them against the Revolutionary Guards.
Same Bollocks you spout regarding strikes in Gaza and the West Bank.

You always manage to just hit the bad guys, it’s fucking amazing.
 
Do women go to the mosque with men? You do realise that the Persians want nothing to do with this oppressive islamic regime who literally invaded them 46 years ago. Maybe pack your keffiyeh and see what it's like over there.
And why did they ‘invade it’ could it be anything to do with the US meddling in other countries again.
 
so I assume that now any forces pitted against Israel can take Netanyahu and his cronies and the heads of the Army as legitimate targets? If any of their family members are killed or injured thats just collateral damage like the wife and kids of Fereydoon Sbssi and all those kids maimed and wounded by exploding pagers
 
Next year is the 60th anniversary of the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem which was the British Army HQ. The bombing killed 97 people and was the action of a Zionist terrorist organization headed by Begin one of Netanyahu's ideological mentors. After the atrocity Begin claimed they never meant to harm anyone. Sound familiar. It's fortunate that Britain did not respond to the same extent to a terrorist atrocity as he Israelis have to their own atrocity
 
MAD works on the basis that participants are all able to think rationally. The Iranian regime do not conform to our notion of rational thinking .
They are lead by religious fanatics.
The eschatology of their belief system encourages them to seek conflict with Israel and the West to bring forward the return of the hidden Imam .
Look up Shia Twelverism and it’s eschatology.
The people in charge of this country actually believe this .
Let me know if you still think they should have access to nuclear weapons .
Led by religious fanatics. Curious, that; does such a categorization remind you of another current Middle Eastern regime? I'll give you a clue, they're killing thousands of civilians a week in the name of their scripture, and taking their land once they've committed their war crimes. Any guesses?

I don't need to look up anything. I know Iran are a tyrannical regime, in much the same way I know Zionism is a tyrannical idealogy. You can't associate any rationality with holding nuclear weapons; they're designed to eradicate humanity. It is, by default, an irrational thing. Where's the rationality in ourselves holding them? Should Israel hold them? Given they're trying to eradicate entirely another state? Are those the trustworthy, responsible actions of a nuclear power?

Whether I think they should hold them is irrelevant: one nation developing them gives licence to every other nation on the planet to develop them. That's the inescapable reality. Blame Oppenheimer. And I revert to my original claim; Iran haven't dropped one precisely because of MAD.
 
Last edited:
Mad fucking Vlad, Donald and that fat little **** in NK have them and haven’t used them on anyone, there’s a fucking reason why.

It’s all bollocks, as already pointed out Iran has been on the brink of the nuclear bond since the 80’s according to Israel. It’s the go to excuse for bombing them, same as in Gaza every hospital or school is a Hamas control centre.
Oh yes the WMD bullshit.
 
This guy, TAC, only posts on this subject. He's not a City fan and I think he should be kicked of BM. He offers nothing.
Support city since 1974
Gilligham
Ewood park
Istanbul
Third division
And Israeli proud who lost freinds and family since 07/10
Not happy with what is happening in Gaza, sad that this is the situation, convinced that the day after the hostages are released, we will never set foot there again after we wipe Hamas from the world

And yes, you can put City aside because I have been a fan of them all my life
 
Support city since 1974
Gilligham
Ewood park
Istanbul
Third division
And Israeli proud who lost freinds and family since 07/10
Not happy with what is happening in Gaza, sad that this is the situation, convinced that the day after the hostages are released, we will never set foot there again after we wipe Hamas from the world

And yes, you can put City aside because I have been a fan of them all my life
OK so during the worst season we've had for a while when most people have been obsessing about Pep, formations, leaving Khusanov out the team, leaving him in etc You couldn't be arsed to comment.
 
OK so during the worst season we've had for a while when most people have been obsessing about Pep, formations, leaving Khusanov out the team, leaving him in etc You couldn't be arsed to comment.
People have other things to do mate. Doesn’t mean he’s not a blue. He’ll be swimming against the tide on here though.
 
I cannot see the equivalence between a group actively looking to preserve humanity and the other hurrying along its destruction or for that matter what colour they may be.
Given this equivalence you choose ,presumably then you are happy to let Iran continue its progress towards the manufacture of a nuclear weapon?

Clearly I'm not alright with Iran developing a nuclear capability because I explicitly stated I don't want weapons of mass destruction in the hands of religious nutjobs or for that matter politicians who use religion as a pretext for dangerous geopolitics that destabilise the world.

We were talking about two countries where members of the government have belief systems that intertwine religious eschatology with political actions and policies.

One of them has an arsenal of 5177 nuclear weapons and remains the only country in history to have used one in combat; the other has spent 30 years failing to make a viable nuclear weapon. But you want me to only worry about the latter and not the former? I'm sorry I just don't get it.

As for the current US administrations desire and ability to 'preserve humanity' I'm genuinely not sure how to respond to that.
 
OK so during the worst season we've had for a while when most people have been obsessing about Pep, formations, leaving Khusanov out the team, leaving him in etc You couldn't be arsed to comment.
I've been going to the forum every day for years
and I enjoy reading comments, I don't respond
but today it's my country that dared after 30 years not to bend over again and absorb, but to respond to the evil people from Iran
I don't have to respond, there's no such law here and today I felt like it. What's the problem?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top