The fantastic dea that the majority of the 50-70,000 dead in Gaza are mainly Hamas is based on what exactly? Show us the evidence...
As for those who died of natural causes, I'm lost for words.
It's interesting that you quantify a massacre at a far higher figure than the current accepted approximate figure of Palestinian deaths. Some may call that convenient.
There is, of course, no defined number for a massacre but I think most people would agree that 50-70,000 deaths would indeed constitute a massacre.
You seem quite intent on calling Hamas out and rightly so, but what about Netanyahu? Does he really care for his people or is he just trying to save his own sorry arse? After all, the families of the hostages are not convinced about his actions or motives. And neither is the International Criminal Court, who have got a warrant out for his arrest.
Seriously, does none of this remotely bother or even resonate with you?
As for your hypothesis that: "If Hamas cares, they would negotiate a safe exit from Gaza in return for freeing the remaining hostages. This would bring the war to an end immediately." ...
Again, another baseless opinion and one very few people would believe.
And as for describing a moderm nuclear state which is being bankrolled by the US to the tune of $4 billion a year systematically destroying a much smaller state and many of the people in it, a state that has no standing army and not even so much as a tank a "war" might help you to mitigate the catastrophic situation in Gaza, but it fools very few others.