There would be far less suffering if Hamas hadn’t started this whole thing off in the first placeDo you honestly believe it would stop further suffering if Hamas surrendered ?
There would be far less suffering if Hamas hadn’t started this whole thing off in the first placeDo you honestly believe it would stop further suffering if Hamas surrendered ?
Depends on what you are in class as suffering , it would reduce it considerably and certainly then put Bibbi under pressure to work towards a sustainable place to live for Palestinians,Do you honestly believe it would stop further suffering if Hamas surrendered ?
Would happily answer that in a dedicated thread but not in this one.
My last post of the night. Should Hamas surrender to save their fellow citizens from further suffering?
We’ve also had at least one person with his own version of the Madagascar Plan without a suggested destination for all the Jews. This would be a result of the state of Israel being consigned to the history books in his scenario. Funnily enough he’s not averse to accusing people of being bigots and antisemites, and unsurprisingly he liked your post.There’s been at least 4 posts that have clearly called for wiping out all of Gaza including children. I would’ve preferred the posts remained to show these cunts for what they are personally.
The posts have subsequently removed. There really are some sick knuckle dragging cunts on here and the real world.
and repeatedly bombing the Rafah crossing. Aid is piling up on the Egyptian side.Be better if Israel let the aid in and stopped slaughtering children.
Three fuckin times they've bombed it knowing folk need to pass through it. Egypt were begging them not to bomb it.and repeatedly bombing the Rafah crossing. Aid is piling up on the Egyptian side.
Interesting...
Do you honestly believe it would stop further suffering if Hamas surrendered ?
So there would still be suffering albeit far less even if hamas didn’t do anything last week.There would be far less suffering if Hamas hadn’t started this whole thing off in the first place
And Hamas released all the hostages.Be better if Israel let the aid in and stopped slaughtering children.
So there would still be suffering albeit far less even if hamas didn’t do anything last week.
Wouldn't be a surprise if he's one of the journalists(?) trained and used by fascists of India, well versed in the art of misinformation.
It's the "from the river to the sea" chant because it implies no Jews in the land, though historically it's been used by Arabs and Jews (and not just historically).I wonder what she finds wrong with people wanting the basic right to freedom
Do you honestly believe it would stop further suffering if Hamas surrendered ?
It's that word "started" that's the problem unless "this whole thing" means just the last 9 days.There would be far less suffering if Hamas hadn’t started this whole thing off in the first place
Because ethnic cleansing doesn't refer to the numbers of a certain population.I've found the "ethnic cleansing" term thrown about a lot and it's just not accurate at all. The Palestinian population has over doubled since 1990 - so why are people just casually dropping this line in?