doots
Well-Known Member
Fuckin hell
Missing woman Nicola Bulley - inquest (P 158)
- Thread starter Blue warrior
- Start date
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,087
This is the main version. Seems it is an innocent mistake, the Scottish team obviously didn't realise of the juxtaposition until it was printed.
Uptheblues said he knew someone so not just an idea.
Kirkstall Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 6,408
- Location
- St Helens. Formally Manchester
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Feature film retracing her walk from the school
The part where they hassle that poor old bloke just taking his dog for a walk is absolutely vile! Kay Burley is a vile twat and Sky are Utter vulchers!!
Kirkstall Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 6,408
- Location
- St Helens. Formally Manchester
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I’m guilty of watching this because I already know most of it, but at least it’s accurate on the route she would of taken to and from school along Blackpool Lane.
It’s easy to see why the police believe she ended up in the river.
They are all vile but at least it shows the route/ map
It’s easy to see why the police believe she ended up in the river.
They are all vile but at least it shows the route/ map
Was the watchdog dry or wet?
City Hobgoblin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 4,282
Has the standard and integrity of print journalism ever been lower?
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
That is grotesque - they didn't just bump into that dog walker who found her phone - a new low
bluetonium
Well-Known Member
I saw a clip from that earlier, unfortunately. The bearded guy seems to have built a rapport with the witness but then lies in wait for him on his dog walking route to interview him on national TV live.
He then gets half of the facts wrong and the old guy has to correct him, and keeps looking at the camera like he's Jeremy Beedle about to pull a prank. Why on earth does this story need two sky interviewers, and why do they present the guy who called in the phone (he didn't even find it) as if it's top story, breaking news, and incredibly insightful and brave reporting,? Their presence in the village is now unnecessary and even harmful.
Absolute empty headed questions too like "how has the last week been" and "it must be hard"... Of course made easier by sky news reporters setting you up for an unannounced live interview and demonstrating first hand they've not been listening to a world you said as it's the "look at me" show.
Awful, awful stuff by sky, they should be ashamed but that's like saying the devil should watch his tan. I'm not even sure the witness knew he was on live TV and he's now revealed his morning routine and details of his family by accident, in a case where we've already seen tick-tocking numbskulls charged for playing super sleuth with little regard for the people involved.
He then gets half of the facts wrong and the old guy has to correct him, and keeps looking at the camera like he's Jeremy Beedle about to pull a prank. Why on earth does this story need two sky interviewers, and why do they present the guy who called in the phone (he didn't even find it) as if it's top story, breaking news, and incredibly insightful and brave reporting,? Their presence in the village is now unnecessary and even harmful.
Absolute empty headed questions too like "how has the last week been" and "it must be hard"... Of course made easier by sky news reporters setting you up for an unannounced live interview and demonstrating first hand they've not been listening to a world you said as it's the "look at me" show.
Awful, awful stuff by sky, they should be ashamed but that's like saying the devil should watch his tan. I'm not even sure the witness knew he was on live TV and he's now revealed his morning routine and details of his family by accident, in a case where we've already seen tick-tocking numbskulls charged for playing super sleuth with little regard for the people involved.
Last edited: