For punitive reasons you’re probably correct but I’d like to see the lot of them bankrupt and their wealth paid into the compensation pot, I’d confiscate all their pensions to leave them living the rest of their lives on a State Pension.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mr Bates vs the Post Office
- Thread starter bluethrunthru
- Start date
For punitive reasons you’re probably correct but I’d like to see the lot of them bankrupt and their wealth paid into the compensation pot, I’d confiscate all their pensions to leave them living the rest of their lives on a State Pension.
There has to be a price to pay, financial or otherwise.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 33,759
Tying herself in knots here....
and this is why we have and need these type of inquiries.
Two Gun Bob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 11,873
Watched this today and one of the highlights off memory was the K.C questioning her ability to dispell truth, by referencing judge frasier of the high court who said said he would only consider van de bogard facting issues in the trial, if these were unequivically correberated by documental proof:
In other words if you told them it's a sunny day, he would have to go outside and check for himself : /
In other words if you told them it's a sunny day, he would have to go outside and check for himself : /
Last edited:
marco
Well-Known Member
so whats the deal at the end of this hearing, do the details go to the court,police or a private prosecution
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
I would imagine the outcome from the findings will be a recommendation (or not) for further action ie, prosecutions as, Alan Bates has said if the inquiry do not initiate prosecutions, he and others will file for themso whats the deal at the end of this hearing, do the details go to the court,police or a private prosecution
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
Does anyone else watch the proceedings and get the impression that senior Post Office employees still can't see what all the fuss is about?