Mr Bates vs the Post Office

I heard an interview on the radio with Lee Castleton last night - he hasn't even bothered submitting his claims the 1/6th figure is he claimed being applied across the board and those making the decisions are implicated in the scandal anyway and he said - rightly in my view - this needs to be put into independent hands to make the decisions on payments
Absolutely, they are just dragging it out again, now it’s not all over the media they will hope public interest disappears and just carry on as before.
 
Absolutely, they are just dragging it out again, now it’s not all over the media they will hope public interest disappears and just carry on as before.
I heard an interview on the radio with Lee Castleton last night - he hasn't even bothered submitting his claims the 1/6th figure is he claimed being applied across the board and those making the decisions are implicated in the scandal anyway and he said - rightly in my view - this needs to be put into independent hands to make the decisions on payments
I would except Sir Wynn to make such recommendations now that he has decided to include a phase in the inquiry that looks specifically at the three compensation schemes. Unfortunately that phase isn't likely to start until September.
https://www.postofficehorizoninquir...nior-individuals-give-evidence-phases-5-and-6

180.jpg
 
Is there a reason they keep having huge long breaks ? The K.C. 's having other work ?
Mainly preparing for the witnesses but also because POL are dragging there feet with disclosure, the chair has all but told them he believes they are looking to obstruct the inquiry. The next phase is due to start 4th April and POL have been told this gives them ample time to comply with all disclosure requests.
 
Mainly preparing for the witnesses but also because POL are dragging there feet with disclosure, the chair has all but told them he believes they are looking to obstruct the inquiry. The next phase is due to start 4th April and POL have been told this gives them ample time to comply with all disclosure requests.
Ta for the reply. I would assume the Chair doesn't have the authority to threaten the PO with a punishment. Not financial, I mean similar to contempt of court.
 
Ta for the reply. I would assume the Chair doesn't have the authority to threaten the PO with a punishment. Not financial, I mean similar to contempt of court.
He can make recommendations to the CPS who would take such recommendations seriously. Justice Fraser did exactly that in the Hillsborough inquiry and that lead to criminal trials. He can also make recommendations to Government under the enquiries act 2005, he has already done this regarding compensation which lead to interim payments being made to sub postmasters.
 
It would appear they are now trying the same method of intimidation to force people to accept derisory compensation payments.
 
Gone relatively quiet on this. Seems something has to be on a tv drama to get action, then the usual suspects go very quiet and revert to previous behaviour
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.