oakiecokie said:aguero93:20 said:Kindly explain Oakie, I'm pretty sure I wasn't arguing this point.oakiecokie said:So you don`t deny that from the info that SB has given,it is incorrect from a Citys point of view ? Only asking ...
As I said only asking, seeing that you are one of the main protagonists,in trying to prove that the MEN is talking bollocks,when they have indeed come forward with some evidence to support their claim that NOT all the claims against them can be proven.
-- Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:14 pm --
moomba said:oakiecokie said:There is a vast difference between a "works experience kid" and a "junior member of staff" irrespective of who was at fault,if any,seeing that you only have a "vague recollection" !!!!
A very poor WUM, moomba.
What are you on about?
I simply said I had a vague recollection of a work experience student being blamed for some article. Wouldn't have a clue what paper, who blamed him or what article.
So basically you aint got a fooking clue but nevertheless you will try and support something which you aint certain about.
Mmmmmmmmmmm.Good job SB can keep on proving some people completely wrong and they aint got the wedding tackle to hold their hands up.It just fits nicely into another agenda by the MEN,as you certainly didn`t state that originally.
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:This is a link to a thread on this forum from when the story first broke: <a class="postlink-local" href="http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=206666&p=4047951&hilit=david+may+35+years#p4047951" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=1&t=206666&p=4047951&hilit=david+may+35+years#p4047951</a>
moomba said:oakiecokie said:aguero93:20 said:Kindly explain Oakie, I'm pretty sure I wasn't arguing this point.
As I said only asking, seeing that you are one of the main protagonists,in trying to prove that the MEN is talking bollocks,when they have indeed come forward with some evidence to support their claim that NOT all the claims against them can be proven.
-- Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:14 pm --
moomba said:What are you on about?
I simply said I had a vague recollection of a work experience student being blamed for some article. Wouldn't have a clue what paper, who blamed him or what article.
So basically you aint got a fooking clue but nevertheless you will try and support something which you aint certain about.
Mmmmmmmmmmm.Good job SB can keep on proving some people completely wrong and they aint got the wedding tackle to hold their hands up.It just fits nicely into another agenda by the MEN,as you certainly didn`t state that originally.
The poster above me said that the work experience story rung a bell. It did with me so I said so. SB hasnt proven me wrong over anything, so I don't know why youre trying to turn this into something it's not.
Starting to sound a bit paranoid to be honest.
Eds said:Find the article you ran about 'our' date for a parade being poached had we have beaten Wigan in the FA Cup final. City were due to play away at Reading on May 14 and the rags had the parade on May 13 which your paper claimed we would have wanted had we won the parade. So even though we would have been at Reading on the Tuesday your paper and your colleague were adament that had we won the final we would have wanted that date. Even when I called and pointed out the fact that City wouldn't even be in Manchester on that Monday I was told in no uncertain terms that I was wrong and your paper was right. The fact that the headline was changed later that day kind of proved my point!
aguero93:20 said:I stated that I wouldn't read the website or paper again after the empty seats article. I wasn't arguing this point, tbh I think I was more taking the piss out of SB today (who I have no personal problem with as a journalist, think is a very decent lad and keep an eye out for on twitter). Think if memory serves me correctly I've spent more time giving out about the daily fail, sun and sky on here then the m.e.n. with the exception of the empty seats article, not too sure what you're on about here Oakie, apologies if I've offended you in some way, but that's a strange reaction to have there to my comment imo.
stuart brennan said:Eds said:Find the article you ran about 'our' date for a parade being poached had we have beaten Wigan in the FA Cup final. City were due to play away at Reading on May 14 and the rags had the parade on May 13 which your paper claimed we would have wanted had we won the parade. So even though we would have been at Reading on the Tuesday your paper and your colleague were adament that had we won the final we would have wanted that date. Even when I called and pointed out the fact that City wouldn't even be in Manchester on that Monday I was told in no uncertain terms that I was wrong and your paper was right. The fact that the headline was changed later that day kind of proved my point!
Here's the article to which you refer <a class="postlink" href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/manchester-united-parade-premier-league-2999147" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... ue-2999147</a>
It doesn't say that United poached the City date. In fact it states that there had been no discussions between City and the council, and that if City did have a parade, it would probably have to be the following week, as City had games at Reading and home to Norwich in the week after the final.
If, as you say, the headline was changed, I can't prove or disprove that - I only have secondhand knowledge of that story, as I didn't write it, so can't vouch for any changes.
TCIB said:He has not told me if he is a barmist or one of those dodgy muffinists yet though Oakie.
These are the important issues in life.
TCIB said:He has not told me if he is a barmist or one of those dodgy muffinists yet though Oakie.
These are the important issues in life.
wrong! :)oakiecokie said:TCIB said:He has not told me if he is a barmist or one of those dodgy muffinists yet though Oakie.
These are the important issues in life.
I think that SB would be a muffin man and MK and Co,barmists,mate.