MUEN again and again

oakiecokie said:
oakiecokie said:
Less haste, more speed.

A motto from your missus ? ;)

That would be more "when are you going to stop drinking and do some jobs around the house you useless, fat lazy bastard".
 
stuart brennan said:
The Flash said:
A very sneaky ploy to generate click thru revenue, Stuart.


We really are not that desperate! Here's a link- not an MEN one, before you bother teacher - that shows we are 34 per cent up in online readership. I really would not waste my time just to get a few dozen clicks on Blue moon.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/how-digital-growth-countering-print-decline-regional-press-title-title-abc-breakdown" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/how-digit ... -breakdown</a>


I AM wasting my time coming on here, it is true, but as I said I feel that lies and inaccuracies, wherever they crop up, need to be challenged.

Lies and inaccuracies need to be challenged. !!!!

So I took a screenshot of a"mistake by a sub editor". Does this mean that I shouldn't challenge it ?

And if I hadn't, would it not have happened (piccies or it didn't happen rule.!!)

And am I still paranoid in accordance with your personal CoC ?
 
barryo said:
Lies and inaccuracies need to be challenged. !!!!

So I took a screenshot of a"mistake by a sub editor". Does this mean that I shouldn't challenge it ?

And if I hadn't, would it not have happened (piccies or it didn't happen rule.!!)

And am I still paranoid in accordance with your personal CoC ?

Absolutely no problem with you flagging up errors, although in this case it was a bit pointless as the person responsible had realised their mistake and already corrected it.
My problem was with the ridiculous use of this error as some kind of evidence of a grand MEN conspiracy to do City down.
THAT is what made it paranoid.
If I was to interpret all the anti-MEN vitriol on here - which includes masses and masses of lies, inaccuracies, half-truths, exaggerations and one-eyed ignorance - as being part of a huge conspiracy by City fans to bring down the MEN, I would also be paranoid.
But I don't. I see the lies etc as evidence that some people on here are liars, some get things wrong, but most are simply football fans being football fans ie seeing everything remotely negative about their club as part of an agenda, and failing to see that other clubs get the same treatment.
 
stuart brennan said:
barryo said:
Lies and inaccuracies need to be challenged. !!!!

So I took a screenshot of a"mistake by a sub editor". Does this mean that I shouldn't challenge it ?

And if I hadn't, would it not have happened (piccies or it didn't happen rule.!!)

And am I still paranoid in accordance with your personal CoC ?

Absolutely no problem with you flagging up errors, although in this case it was a bit pointless as the person responsible had realised their mistake and already corrected it.
My problem was with the ridiculous use of this error as some kind of evidence of a grand MEN conspiracy to do City down.
THAT is what made it paranoid.
If I was to interpret all the anti-MEN vitriol on here - which includes masses and masses of lies, inaccuracies, half-truths, exaggerations and one-eyed ignorance - as being part of a huge conspiracy by City fans to bring down the MEN, I would also be paranoid.
But I don't. I see the lies etc as evidence that some people on here are liars, some get things wrong, but most are simply football fans being football fans ie seeing everything remotely negative about their club as part of an agenda, and failing to see that other clubs get the same treatment.

There is more than a slight difference between the largest read online regional news outlet in the uk(140,000 unique browsers per day .!!!) run by PAID professionals who's job it is to provide accurate newsworthy articles for all of those "unique browsers" and an Internet forum for a football team ran by volunteers who's main aim is to not get shut down.!!!!

Anonymity is a powerful tool when used anonymously .!!!!

Keep up the good work Mr Brennan.......we will be watching and waiting to pounce ..!!!!!
 
TBF Stuart, I don't think City have had the same treatment off the MEN as United have had over the last X amount of years.

However, over the last 7-8 months, the MEN has been doing it's best to rectify that. ;-)

Keep up the good work. :-)

BTW. Any chance you can do an article on the #SOD Campaign? See the General football thread.<br /><br />-- Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:33 pm --<br /><br />TBF Stuart, I don't think City have had the same treatment off the MEN as United have had over the last X amount of years.

However, over the last 7-8 months, the MEN has been doing it's best to rectify that. ;-)

Keep up the good work. :-)

BTW. Any chance you can do an article on the #SOD Campaign? See the General football thread.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.