Elbow beards
Well-Known Member
And still nothing about loading massive debts on clubs... Ooh wonder why?
Two thingsTo establish market value they would need to speak to the prospective sponsor and see their figures and plans for justification (you know - like sensitive and in some cases critical business details ) of offering the agreed contact amounts. They have absolutely no right to demand that business critical detail that may be of use to a rival.
Let's just say, for example, you were an American bank, with no branches or current account offerings in the UK, why would you sponsor a English football team? Or maybe you're an American car manufacturer and don't have any dealerships in the UK? What is the market advantage of sponsoring an PL team and when do the figures justify the investment?
An investor may say, ' I want to grow my brand internationally and have looked at business plans and engagement of local communities around the world but crucially, success would drive that idea.
Anyway, they are all valid reasons, whether we like them or not, and it's up to them.
p.s . Obviously, if the American bank in the example, were to have committed various money laundering activities and dealt with terrorists, they would need to sportwash their reputation and only they would know the value of sponsorship against their profits from said activities.
And who were fined 1.9 billion for money laundering Colombian drug cartel moneyTwo things
PL is a global entity the players shirts are see world wide
Standard Chartered is a UK bank who operate globally
I stand correctedTwo things
PL is a global entity the players shirts are see world wide
Standard Chartered is a UK bank who operate globally
Maybe I wasn't clear, apologies, but the point was whether we like it or not, it is up to the individual companies and PL's global appeal is a valid reason. for some companies.Two things
PL is a global entity the players shirts are see world wide
Standard Chartered is a UK bank who operate globally
I can't see how that won't be the caseIs this going to be like FFP, where it's designed to hit City but actually only screws over the smaller PL clubs that were convinced to vote for it?