Gone for a Burton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2022
- Messages
- 3,869
- Team supported
- City
Cheers.
The SS 2/3 must become all City with away fans shifted down to ES1/SS1 around the corner flag.
Poor acoustics and views !!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
North Stand Expansion | Configuration plans revealed by club (p 1285)
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
The SS 2/3 must become all City with away fans shifted down to ES1/SS1 around the corner flag.
Poor acoustics and views !!
Gone for a Burton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2022
- Messages
- 3,869
- Team supported
- City
That's not half the NS2 capacity.
supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,502
Disappointing.
This was a chance to create a home end. The club could have sat down with the key groups to make it happen. There's a need to drive revenue and undoubtedly the club don't want to revisit other parts of the ground to deliver it elsewhere, at cost, but a better compromise could have been reached.
They should have advised on season tickets at this stage ideally, as the lack of detail there leads to more scrutiny and negativity. Whilst it's a way off yet, there's a spreadsheet with all the numbers in and it isn't going to change.
3,000 rail seats is okay, could be more but if it was known that it was at the back of the stand with the rest of the stand also being for new and existing season ticket holders it would improve the overall appeal.
The GA+ being front and centre, based on the info they've given, is also now a problem. You'll have lots of day trippers and tourists in an area that should be visually intimidating and a key part of the home end.
I hope the club rethink things, but I've always been sceptical.
This was a chance to create a home end. The club could have sat down with the key groups to make it happen. There's a need to drive revenue and undoubtedly the club don't want to revisit other parts of the ground to deliver it elsewhere, at cost, but a better compromise could have been reached.
They should have advised on season tickets at this stage ideally, as the lack of detail there leads to more scrutiny and negativity. Whilst it's a way off yet, there's a spreadsheet with all the numbers in and it isn't going to change.
3,000 rail seats is okay, could be more but if it was known that it was at the back of the stand with the rest of the stand also being for new and existing season ticket holders it would improve the overall appeal.
The GA+ being front and centre, based on the info they've given, is also now a problem. You'll have lots of day trippers and tourists in an area that should be visually intimidating and a key part of the home end.
I hope the club rethink things, but I've always been sceptical.
rowsley_st
Well-Known Member
It would make sense to me if the existing lower tier was converted to rail seating. This wouldn’t impair the sight lines from the expanded upper tier, and who would want to stand up anyway when you are already hundreds of feet above and away from the pitch?
I’m at the back of 116 and it was really good.Everyone should care about the atmosphere. Arsenal last week was fucking awful, for a game of that magnitude. What’s the point of going to the football if you don’t want to join in on the singing? You don’t have to stand up and go mad, just join in.
However.. when I watched the TV on catch up it didn’t come across like that at all.
I think we just have to face facts that the stadium does not keep the noise it like say Newcastle, Sheff Utd, Wolves for example.. old grounds with structures that don’t leak the noise.
What exactly is a ‘breakout space’?You'll never sing that
You'll never sing that
We've got religious rooms and breakout spaces
You'll never sing that
GA+ isn’t ’day Trippers’ and ‘tourists’ though. It’s seasonal card members.Disappointing.
This was a chance to create a home end. The club could have sat down with the key groups to make it happen. There's a need to drive revenue and undoubtedly the club don't want to revisit other parts of the ground to deliver it elsewhere, at cost, but a better compromise could have been reached.
They should have advised on season tickets at this stage ideally, as the lack of detail there leads to more scrutiny and negativity. Whilst it's a way off yet, there's a spreadsheet with all the numbers in and it isn't going to change.
3,000 rail seats is okay, could be more but if it was known that it was at the back of the stand with the rest of the stand also being for new and existing season ticket holders it would improve the overall appeal.
The GA+ being front and centre, based on the info they've given, is also now a problem. You'll have lots of day trippers and tourists in an area that should be visually intimidating and a key part of the home end.
I hope the club rethink things, but I've always been sceptical.
Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,368
Yeah, that's kind of how it all got merged in my head. Two home ends would in theory be fantastic. Bouncing off each other when it's flat, competing etc. Does that even exist in topflight football anymore though? Probably only Germany if it does.Cheers.
The SS 2/3 must become all City with away fans shifted down to ES1/SS1 around the corner flag.
Poor acoustics and views !!
I’m at the back of 116 and it was really good.
However.. when I watched the TV on catch up it didn’t come across like that at all.
I think we just have to face facts that the stadium does not keep the noise it like say Newcastle, Sheff Utd, Wolves for example.. old grounds with structures that don’t leak the noise.
I think the accustic issues are down to shallow tiers, especially L2, concrete overhangs, gaps between the stands and tiers, and a high roof/line.
It’s a bit like a poor Wi-Fi signal in a house, blocked by doors, walls, and other obstructions, so the Wi-Fi signal struggles to reach every room.
wearethesouthstand
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Feb 2008
- Messages
- 1,870
One line we’ve seen is - oh we haven’t got 7-8000 singers to go in an end like that so why is that a red line.
We absolutely have the singers already in the ground. We already have 7000 standing regularly at City. But they aren’t in one area.
750 in 111 , 4,000 in 114 to 119 . All of 314 stands - 375. All of 315 stands - 750. Then the back 6-7 rows of 316 317 and 318 stand. Imagine all them together in one area ?
That’s what a request of 7-8000 allows for and to get the right people to move to a new end it has to have the right pulling power - here’s the space now come and fill it. People like the views from south 3, they like the party atmosphere in south 1, with a dj on the concourse etc and south standers like the proximity to the away fans.
Getting people to move there is possible but has to be a better offer than what people are getting now. Otherwise they just stay.
We’d support new people going in there and doing what they can and hopefully there’s enough energy to spark 2 ends to sing to each other. The devil is in the detail though.
But to have a small section only runs the risk of splitting the existing singers even more from 3 sections to 4. Which means it’s even harder and the pockets of singers get swamped by day trippers.
We absolutely have the singers already in the ground. We already have 7000 standing regularly at City. But they aren’t in one area.
750 in 111 , 4,000 in 114 to 119 . All of 314 stands - 375. All of 315 stands - 750. Then the back 6-7 rows of 316 317 and 318 stand. Imagine all them together in one area ?
That’s what a request of 7-8000 allows for and to get the right people to move to a new end it has to have the right pulling power - here’s the space now come and fill it. People like the views from south 3, they like the party atmosphere in south 1, with a dj on the concourse etc and south standers like the proximity to the away fans.
Getting people to move there is possible but has to be a better offer than what people are getting now. Otherwise they just stay.
We’d support new people going in there and doing what they can and hopefully there’s enough energy to spark 2 ends to sing to each other. The devil is in the detail though.
But to have a small section only runs the risk of splitting the existing singers even more from 3 sections to 4. Which means it’s even harder and the pockets of singers get swamped by day trippers.
GA+ isn’t ’day Trippers’ and ‘tourists’ though. It’s seasonal card members.
It’s vol-au-vent eaters and wine quaffers. ;-)