One away win in 105 games when losing at half time

no, it doesn't. It's an appalling stat on its own merit and we need to be better at it.
That doesn't make sense. Without comparative information the stat is meaningless and you cannot judge it to be an 'appalling stat'

Its a very specific stat and for all I know the average turnroad for PL games is higher than 105 games. So we could be doing better than the norm.
 
It's a meaningless stat that simply outlines how many games we were winning at HT or certainly not trailing. If it was a stat that concluded we haven't won a game for thirty matches then it would then be a cause for some slight concern. If it were a badge that boasted we had won every game after trailing at HT we'd need to know just how many games we were trailing. I weep for the games we were leading at HT and lost!
 
It's a meaningless stat that simply outlines how many games we were winning at HT or certainly not trailing. If it was a stat that concluded we haven't won a game for thirty matches then it would then be a cause for some slight concern. If it were a badge that boasted we had won every game after trailing at HT we'd need to know just how many games we were trailing. I weep for the games we were leading at HT and lost!
It only makes sense if you know how many games we were losing at half time. We don't lose many games at all so it must be a pretty small number.
 
Just sharing a stat which doesn’t look good on us doesn’t it. Just find it interesting why it’s such a bad record?. Not interested? How about not read it kid

Problem with some stats is that they don’t explain all the parameters. For example - for the king of Belgium -not very bright - guy, it’s NOT just during Pep’s time; it’s NOT every time we’ve gone behind, only against TOP - rated sides; it goes back to 1985 I think.

anyway - it’s a useless stat as it’s out of context.
 
It is a shocking stat but one that is irrelevant to this team as it stretches back to 1995.

Would be interesting to compare to other teams but there doesn't seem to be anything on the net to confirm
 
  • Like
Reactions: CC1
I don't understand all the aggression towards the OP. Quite childish on some people's part. If you don't like the status, don't comment on the thread. It's that simple. Unless you're just trying to get your post count up and look good.

The fact that we have only come from behind and gone on to win once since 1995 when losing at half time is staggering. I don't think it's something the players and staff will be aware of but as a fan, if we are losing at half time I have ever the mentality that we won't go on to win the game, like I did on Saturday. (It was a statement i was already aware of).

But it depends on what other teams have done during same period. For all we know, it might be similar to all other clubs. There’s no context - which is why some folk get sucked in
 
Problem with some stats is that they don’t explain all the parameters. For example - for the king of Belgium -not very bright - guy, it’s NOT just during Pep’s time; it’s NOT every time we’ve gone behind, only against TOP - rated sides; it goes back to 1985 I think.

anyway - it’s a useless stat as it’s out of context.
Its every time we are down at half time in the league nothing to do with top sides, the one win is against Huddersfield.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.