One very bitter author...

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.

United are built on £600.000.000 of debit.

Arsenal poached talent from Southampton, Cardiff etc.

Liverpool spent £100.000.000 to win the league cup.

Didn't hear him crying for when Chelsea nicked SWP and Sturrage.

Yes we bought the best and it will make us the best HOORAY.
 
When he says our MO is ruining football and yet Villa under Randy Lerner were "under transition" I am reminded of that George Bernard Shaw anecdote where he offered.a woman a million pounds to sleep with him which she agreed to. He then revised his offer and offered her a pound. She refused saying "what sort of woman do you think I am?" To which Shaw replied:"we have already established that, now we are merely negotiating the price".

I am sure that if ADUG had thought that Villa had a bigger potential for growth it would have been them, and not us they would have bought in 2008. Perhaps Villa's smaller crowds and smaller stadium at the time put them off.

Blues of a certain vintage will remember Villa coming in and raiding the club of our manager, Billy McNeill, in 1986, which quite possibly cost us relegation that season. I remember feeling a little irritated at Villa's greatet financial muscle, but even then I realised how the world works and took it on the chin. Perhaps if Lerner had invested the Milner money in the team rather than reducing his own financial exposure this writer (assuming he's actually a Villa fan) would feel as I did back then rather than an overwhelming sense of bitterness.

I would also add that I would rather have an owner that drilled for oil, than one whose company operated on the edges of the sub-prime market in terms of the interest rates that it charges its less well off customers.
 
The £400 million sponsorship of Man City’s stadium by Abu Dhabi Group owned Etihad is, overtly and unashamedly, just another way to pump £400 million of their own money into the club. It is cheating, and it undermines the system, again. But even if this system does work, there is a very high chance that it will be a poisoned chalice.

How the fuck can he get away with that? I really hope the club take action in this ****.
 
Why bother to post it here? The author admits being call a cnut was it 35 times and rightfully so.
 
'The league is in danger of becoming repetitive and non-competitive.'

This has only just happened? Really?

Also the thick get can't spell 'rein in' and is apparently oblivious to the fact that FFP will screw clubs like Villa forever, and make sure the league is 'repetitive and non-competitive.'
 
There is little doubt that we are the lottery winners of world football, but as they clambered to point out in 2008 "you can't buy this league" and "top players wont come because you have no history" which has slowly but surely turned into this bile in the OP, it's crystal clear that they are jealous and I don't blame them, if the boot were on the other foot I would be jealous too but it isn't so I'm not lol

We are the council estate lottery winner driving back down our old street in a porsche 911 dripping in gold wearing designer clothes and the old neighbours think we are flash and arrogant, it's understandable but at the end of it all we are the ones sat in the porsche so sod em, lets drive !!!.
 
rickmcfc said:
The £400 million sponsorship of Man City’s stadium by Abu Dhabi Group owned Etihad is, overtly and unashamedly, just another way to pump £400 million of their own money into the club. It is cheating, and it undermines the system, again. But even if this system does work, there is a very high chance that it will be a poisoned chalice.

How the fuck can he get away with that? I really hope the club take action in this ****.


For some reason, people seem to have a problem with a guy taking money from one bussiness and injecting it into another. What the fook is wrong with this!!

Im my town we have a factory owned by that Majeski fella, the same one that owns Reading FC. When people moan about what our owner has done I always ask them 'If one of Majeski's bussiness was making profit ten fold but the other was struggling and needed some moeny pumped into it to make it stronger-weather it be new players at the club to push them on or things like new machinary to make the factory run in a more profitable way, would it be wrong for him to take the huge profits from one bussiness to make another stronger? Or would they rather see a football club fold or a factory go under and see thousands of people lose their jobs?

They usually cant say fook all back to that.
 
themadinventor said:
We are the council estate lottery winner driving back down our old street in a porsche 911 dripping in gold wearing designer clothes and the old neighbours think we are flash and arrogant, it's understandable but at the end of it all we are the ones sat in the porsche so sod em, lets drive !!!.
Poor analogy TMI. We are showing considerably more restraint and "class" than that.
 
Pam said:
Could not give the turd of a dung beetle what the twats think. They're just going to have to get used to it.

agreed. I've given up arguing with other fans now, I just tell them to get over it and support their team and hope they can get second next season.
 
FFP is to blame for our accelerated spending. We had a ten year plan that would have been more self sustaining, and created less waves. FFP was seen as the door closing to investment for the future, so the plan had to be brought forward. FFP was meant to prevent clubs over spending, but was tuned to prevent rich owners investing for short term success. It is becoming clear that it will stifle future investment, and ring fence those already enjoying success. Once less successful clubs realise that they have no chance of getting to the top, they will start challenging FFP. They will end up as feeder clubs to the top clubs, as that is the only way they can make up for less TV money.
City have a very robust plan to be completely self sustaining. An increased fan base/stadium, increased advertising revenues, increased TV money and a world class academy (generating new players and money), will mean FFP will have no impact on us long term. FFP only then serves to strengthen our position.
Once FIFA realises this, the goal posts will be moved, and FFP will change. There is not a team in the world who wouldn't want our owners and business plan. Jealousy is the driving force for such bile. Even the red biased press cannot get their heads around the fact that things are going to change. All the positives surrounding City mean they are having to dig deep to find anything negative. They cannot call our football, they cannot call our investment in the community. They cannot call any of our players (most are in fact very respected), and Ballotelli antics are just a distraction and harmless. So all that is left if our finances.
Imagine if we had lost an 8 point lead with 6 games remaining? They would be having a field day and feeding frenzy. It would be the daily subject and sensational headlines. But no, because it's United, they are keeping their powder dry. They don't want to upset the red nosed one, so just print how unlucky they have been with injuries, and that the "young" team needs time to bed in.
I thought United had the experience to wrap up the league because of their winning mentality, and that City had none?

Remember one thing. The press are predators. Once they see United slipping, they WILL go in for the kill. They know which side their bread is buttered. So suck up all these negatives stories, as it will make watching it be reversed even more enjoyable!
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
themadinventor said:
We are the council estate lottery winner driving back down our old street in a porsche 911 dripping in gold wearing designer clothes and the old neighbours think we are flash and arrogant, it's understandable but at the end of it all we are the ones sat in the porsche so sod em, lets drive !!!.
Poor analogy TMI. We are showing considerably more restraint and "class" than that.

Fair point, I was thinking more from their point of view, how it appears to the other teams/fans but yes I agree it was a poor analogy.
 
stony said:
Why bother posting the rabid ramblings of a jumped up, wannabe journo, snot gobbling, no mark like him.
Just another rag crying like a bitch to anyone who will listen. We're laughing at you here, you rag prick.

Villa fan my arse, our starting 11 cost the same as the rags but he isn't bleating about them.

Eggfuckinzackly.

Just because it's a long bit of writing and is on the internet it doesn't make it any more 'worthy' an opinion than the plastic's down the pub.
I gave up at the 2nd para.
 
themadinventor said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
themadinventor said:
We are the council estate lottery winner driving back down our old street in a porsche 911 dripping in gold wearing designer clothes and the old neighbours think we are flash and arrogant, it's understandable but at the end of it all we are the ones sat in the porsche so sod em, lets drive !!!.
Poor analogy TMI. We are showing considerably more restraint and "class" than that.

Fair point, I was thinking more from their point of view, how it appears to the other teams/fans but yes I agree it was a poor analogy.
Fair play and apologies for calling your attitude to supporting City as spineless a few weeks ago :-)

I would say that we are the lottery winner that drives an Aston Martin, gives a great deal of our new found wealth to charity, still lives in the same house as we've not fogotten where we came from, whose new status really.annoys our next door neighbours - although we actually quite enjoy that because they've been unbearable for years.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
themadinventor said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Poor analogy TMI. We are showing considerably more restraint and "class" than that.

Fair point, I was thinking more from their point of view, how it appears to the other teams/fans but yes I agree it was a poor analogy.
Fair play and apologies for calling your attitude to supporting City as spineless a few weeks ago :-)

I would say that we are the lottery winner that drives an Aston Martin, gives a great deal of our new found wealth to charity, still lives in the same house as we've not fogotten where we came from, whose new status really.annoys our next door neighbours - although we actually quite enjoy that because they've been unbearable for years.

No apology required but thanks anyway, yes that's a much better "classy" analogy, nice one.
 
Simple fact:

1) Football is now a (massive) business.
2) All businesses need big investors. We have found one.
3) Any other club offered the chance would do the same.
4) If any club produced a crop of young stars, they would be snapped up by the mega-clubs, here or abroad.
5) the financial scene has been changed radically - not by us. We just do the same, only better.

Who is this buffoon of a blogger?
 
Big Swifty said:
Simple fact:

1) Football is now a (massive) business.
2) All businesses need big investors. We have found one.
3) Any other club offered the chance would do the same.
4) If any club produced a crop of young stars, they would be snapped up by the mega-clubs, here or abroad.
5) the financial scene has been changed radically - not by us. We just do the same, only better.

Who is this buffoon of a blogger?

Nail on head.
As has always been the case, clubs with financial clout snap up any promising young players from clubs that aren't so well endowed money wise.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top