I wonder if the QPR game would have been as significant if we'd steamrollered them. Zabaleta gets the first, we get a second early in the second half then 2 or 3 more.
Obviously winning our first Premier league title was hugely significant but was it the means rather than the end which made it so much more so?
Two games since the takeover that stand out for me are the FA Cup semi final against the rags, where we really established our superiority over them for the first time. Then 4 weeks later we beat Spurs 1-0 to get a CL spot for the first time.
Gillingham was obviously important but I reckon the three consecutive away games we won in 2006/7 (Boro, Newcastle & Fulham) were so important to us. Our financial situation was poor at that point and had we only got 5 points out of those games rather than 9, we'd have been relegated. That would have almost certainly meant no Thaksin and possibly financial disaster.
The outcome might well have been that the Supporters Trust would have got hold of Sky's shares and allied with Bernstein, Franny Lee and possibly Mark Boler. There would have been nasty boardroom battles as both Bernstein and Lee were looking to settle some old scores.
The 1-0 win at Newcastle on March 31st made sure we avoided relegation following the 2-0 win at Boro two weeks earlier and saved us from all that.