I am aware of that.I'd intended to steer well clear of this thread, and this is off the direct topic, but the members of the EHRC are political appointees. (Sorry the report is from the Guardian but you wouldn't find such concerns in the Torygraph.) And no, I'm not suggesting the EHRC report was an anti-Corbyn conspiracy. (And what has happened to the Tory investigations into MPs and candidates accused of Islamaphobia and/or antisemitism?)
EHRC board member under scrutiny over social media use | Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) | The Guardian
The EHRC still has no evidence against it for corruption or conspiracy, and to suggest its report into Labour were biased, would be similar to suggesting CAS weren’t fit for purpose to find City innocent.
It’s for the birds stuff that’s pushed by hardened Corbyn supporters who cannot accept reality.