Pep signs new deal until 2023!

M12Blue

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 Sep 2017
Messages
1,752
Good question, and a question we won't know the answer to unless players are tried in competitive games against decent opposition. I'm sure not all will make it, more pressure nowadays like you say. But players coming through in a batch has happened before. We brought several through around 85/6 and the rags had their Busby babes and class of 92. Liverpool were famous for bringing youth through in the 70/80s. Everyone is talking about signing Haaland. He's doing great and ticking all the boxes of a top striker. But I'd love to see how good Delap is this season for us. Too easy to go and keep throwing big money around to solve a problem. It's a good job our owners are loaded because a hell of a lot of money has been wasted on players since they came.
Can’t disagree, and reckon the majority of fans would prefer to see 3 academy boys replace Mahrez, gundy and Fernandinho (hard to type that) in the first instance and see how they do.

Personally I reckon it’s likely to happen sooner than we all thing as Pep evolves dealing with the constant 10 man block. Here’s hoping
 

sir baconface

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
17,621
Location
Not in my lifetime.
I hear what‘s said in public but actions speak louder than words.

Even after last season’s COVID restart, when the League was long lost, the youngsters other than Foden were hardly given a run-out. And if hadn’t been for top 4 being more or less in the bag, and Foden grabbing his opportunity by the scruff of the neck, how much would we have seen of Phil?

Unfortunately, there’s also pressure to avoid pissing off established fringe players by playing them in “easier” games - depending on their faces. In fairness there is balance to be struck but a bit more towards our academy prospects would be welcome. It might even avoid another £50m signing in the not too distant future.
 

hilts

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 Oct 2008
Messages
19,471
Location
In the cooler
I hear what‘s said in public but actions speak louder than words.

Even after last season’s COVID restart, when the League was long lost, the youngsters other than Foden were hardly given a run-out. And if hadn’t been for top 4 being more or less in the bag, and Foden grabbing his opportunity by the scruff of the neck, how much would we have seen of Phil?

Unfortunately, there’s also pressure to avoid pissing off established fringe players by playing them in “easier” games - depending on their faces. In fairness there is balance to be struck but a bit more towards our academy prospects would be welcome. It might even avoid another £50m signing in the not too distant future.

He feels he needs to keep the senior players match fit and not ruin moral.
 

sir baconface

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
17,621
Location
Not in my lifetime.
Does it really make a difference how long a manager’s contract is for?

IIRC, the rags signed the Football Genius on a 5-year agreement. He lasted all of 5 minutes.

In practice, performance matters far more than the nominal length of contact.

Edit. Just seen someone mention Pardew. His contract was even longer.
 

sir baconface

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
17,621
Location
Not in my lifetime.
Go on then, give us recent examples of successful teams with long serving managers. Because I can't think of any.

People might want a long term manager but we don't need one. There's no reason to think otherwise.

Edit: and Chelsea are the second most successful English club of the last decade after us.
And our four PL titles in this period were under three different managers.
 

Don't have an account?

Register now!
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.