I don't blame him, I wouldn't give my hard earned to a company who treat you like shit, no fucking way. Watch it at home where you can smoke, swear and even wank if you so desire.howfen blue said:I know a bloke who was kicked out for flicking the v's at united at the derby he got a 3 game ban and hasn't been since and is adamant he never will do again!!!!swp80 said:Thats how i feel, but fucking the club off because of one person is not that easy, I love the club just as much as i did last week, but obviously somethings need changing.
howfen blue said:I know a bloke who was kicked out for flicking the v's at united at the derby he got a 3 game ban and hasn't been since and is adamant he never will do again!!!!swp80 said:Thats how i feel, but fucking the club off because of one person is not that easy, I love the club just as much as i did last week, but obviously somethings need changing.
<br /><br />-- Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:21 pm --<br /><br />swp80 said:Had another E-mail of him, dont care now im takking further action.
Mr woops left my last name in,
As I explained in my previous e-mail, we have a system to ensure that the persons who are seen smoking are correctly identified to the Ejection team. This procedure was correctly carried out. There was a delay in the ejection team dealing with this matter as they were dealing with another issue at the time of the incident in the toilets but as soon as they were able they attended to the incident involving you and your friends.
You should send him one back saying it was a massive, monumental mistake that his dad ejected him into his mums fanny. The guy sounds like a wanker.
In respect of your third point, I cannot really answer that as every case is different.
The stewards involved in combating smoking are under strict instructions that they must be 100% certain that someone is smoking and that the persons ejected are the same persons who they saw smoking. They have assured me that that is the case and
there is no reason why I should not accept their version of events as they have dealt with this incident correctly.
I am sorry that you feel that you have been unjustly punished but I have to make decisions on the evidence that is presented to me.
Regards
Peter Fletcher
You should send him one back saying it was a massive, monumental mistake that his dad ejected him into his mums fanny. He sounds like a total wanker.swp80 said:Had another E-mail of him, dont care now im takking further action.
Mr woops left my last name in,
As I explained in my previous e-mail, we have a system to ensure that the persons who are seen smoking are correctly identified to the Ejection team. This procedure was correctly carried out. There was a delay in the ejection team dealing with this matter as they were dealing with another issue at the time of the incident in the toilets but as soon as they were able they attended to the incident involving you and your friends.
You should send him one back saying it was a massive, monumental mistake that his dad ejected him into his mums fanny. The guy sounds like a wanker.
In respect of your third point, I cannot really answer that as every case is different.
The stewards involved in combating smoking are under strict instructions that they must be 100% certain that someone is smoking and that the persons ejected are the same persons who they saw smoking. They have assured me that that is the case and
there is no reason why I should not accept their version of events as they have dealt with this incident correctly.
I am sorry that you feel that you have been unjustly punished but I have to make decisions on the evidence that is presented to me.
Regards
Peter Fletcher
As I explained in my previous e-mail, we have a system to ensure that the persons who are seen smoking are correctly identified to the Ejection team. This procedure was correctly carried out
eshiers1 said:clearly a case of being found guilty before you have the chance to prove your innocence
while he says its one persons word v anothers that surely works both ways, how can he 100% trust the steward and (with all due respect) he cant trust you at all - imagine all the people in the past who wil have claimed innocence.