And Foden hasn't had any really yet.Ireland’s not even on the same planet as Foden.
Ireland had about 1 good season throughout his whole career, also.
No coincidence that our two worst games have been the ones he hasn't started.
And..it also ,begs the question...Could he have made a difference if he had started more games this season.?We struggle without him and KDB. We lack any directness and our play is too slow and predictable. It shows how unbelievable a talent he is when we expect him to be the difference.
And..it also ,begs the question...Could he have made a difference if he had started more games this season.?
At the end of the day,20 odd points is a big difference
I'd argue we certainly couldn't have done worse which is why I don't buy into the narrative that Pep has handled him 'perfectly'. Whenever he's played this season, he's offered us directness and unpredictability which we've been crying out for. Our overall play this season especially when we start Silva, Bernardo, Jesus, Gundogan etc is a very slow and uninspiring brand of offence imo; Foden and KDB are musts in our attack.
The proof will come at the end of his career, if it is as long, successful and honour filled as his potential suggests. If it is, job done.The thing with the Pep/Foden handling debate is that both sides can't be proven wrong and both interpret the same evidence - him doing well - as proof of their theory.
If Foden is one of our best players after 3 starts, people who thought he should be held back this long think it's a masterstroke, "Look how good he is, now he's ready".
And people who think he should have played sooner think "Clearly he was ready before now if he's already undroppable"
IMO The truth is probably that he could have played earlier, and that would have helped us as a team earlier in the season, but Phil personally has benefitted from being kept back until he's more than good enough, sheltered from England and the media.