MintedJust curious does anyone the financial status of the PL ? Are they flush with money or stone broke. I assume they submit annual accounts?
MintedJust curious does anyone the financial status of the PL ? Are they flush with money or stone broke. I assume they submit annual accounts?
Did they? Didn’t realise that. So did anyone else ‘withdraw’ their signature back then, or was it just Wolves?Possibly, but Newcastle would seem a reasonable bet, as would Wolves given they withdrew almost immediately.
Is that the Jordan who is a failed club owner, the very person that FFP would hope to prevent from owning a club?Anyone seen the article in the mail by that absolute **** Jordon.
The limitation act also says that if you are bringing a claim based on the fraud of the other party the limitation period does not start to run until you had knowledge of the fraud. So the six year period begins not with the date of the breaches, but the date those breaches became known to the PL - IF they were breaches brought about by fraud.
Make of this what you will, but I've just been privy to some startling information that would blow the lid off PGMOL and the power brokers at the Premier League, if it became public. It involves a recording of a conversation between the match day referee and VAR official at a recent away match, a recording that is now in the hands of City.
It's my firm belief that City have compiled a dossier so incendiary, that the Premier League will have no choice but to totally exonerate the Club of any wrongdoing. If they don't, this is going nuclear. Either way, we hold all the cards and this explains why we're so bullish about the eventual outcome. The Premier League are on the back foot, and in my opinion, are currently lobbying the membership as to how best to quietly end the process. I have also been advised that at least one of the "Nasty 9" has had board level discussions with City, distancing themselves from the others in the cabal.
Pep's press conference tells us all we need to know. Watch it again, look at the anger and barely controllable rage in the mans eyes. His attitude wasn't based upon him being reassured about some poxy finances & bullshit charges, it was because he KNOWS exactly what is coming.
Sit back and enjoy the ride Blues.
What made me suspicious was that virtually all the press ran a story saying the decision had been made by VAR which suggested they had been briefed. It was obvious in the ground that Attwell had overruled the linesman and there was not enough time for any proper VAR check. So Michael Oliver was stitched up. The worst thing is the broadcasters must be aware of this because they hear the taped conversation but they have not broadcast the story. I believe the broadcasters are complicit in the failure of VAR. It doesn't automatically mean it was a bent decision but it does mean it was a total cock-up which has been covered up. Let's see what happens.
I agree it looked very strange that the TV studio people were unanimous that it was wrong.
Did they? Didn’t realise that. So did anyone else ‘withdraw’ their signature back then, or was it just Wolves?