Interesting.
he has , but this lad puts it at a level most people who haven't read bluemoon in the picture, any information however little is sort of helpful, and if that information is put in a way the average person can understand then im all for it, when i read some of the stuff on here,im thinking what have i just read :)Thoughts? @projectriver
If you've not seen, here is the the link to the document referred to in the video.
NB As others have said, you seem to have covered all this before on spaces, your article and podcasts.
Spot on Spf.he has , but this lad puts it at a level most people who haven't read bluemoon in the picture, any information however little is sort of helpful, and if that information is put in a way the average person can understand then im all for it, when i read some of the stuff on here,im thinking what have i just read :)
I didn`t really see it like that. ;)The one on the video overly concerned about other fans' opinions.
I’ve been following him and I believe he has great potential. Very articulate and knowledgable. There are some good boys on YouTube and he is another one. We can’t have too much access to YouTubers putting it out there for us all to enjoy.I suggested that a while ago. There’ll be no new information until we hear the result.
Stefan and Colin have both released the most concise breakdown of what has happened and what is likely to happen.
I’ve nothing against the bloke. I hope he earns enough to keep doing what he does, but it’s a slightly more informal, dumbed down version of what is already out there.
Come again?he has , but this lad puts it at a level most people who haven't read bluemoon in the picture, any information however little is sort of helpful, and if that information is put in a way the average person can understand then im all for it, when i read some of the stuff on here,im thinking what have i just read :)
Having read it, it looks like the video is based on the MEN article, rather than the full document.Thoughts on the document he refers to (not the video)? @projectriver
If you've not seen, here is the link:
NB As others have said, you seem to have covered all this before on spaces, your article and podcasts.
Having read it, it looks like the video is based on the MEN article, rather than the full document.
I may be wrong, but it's certainly not as positive as the article or video.
Throughout, they do suggest that the bar is high for the Premier League, but they also suggest that it may be a lot more of a challenge for City than the UEFA case, and conclude by summing up City's position, "Put simply, defending this claim would require the deployment of enormous resources, intuitive legal reasoning, and persuasion beyond known boundaries." Which doesn't sound particularly easy.
QueCome again?