Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
The "Liverpool Thought Bank" ?
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
The "Liverpool Thought Bank" ?
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,629
Citizen of Legoland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 10,019
What’s that about the dosier (sic) being stopped at customs? Eh? And how do FIFA come in to this?
Obviously a joke by someone.
Eric Hitchmough
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 3,089
The absolute state of that. Stick it in the Liverpool thread.
The lawyers have proposed in addition that the PL should “Go fuck itself.”
Enough fuckwits read it and its not only true, it's also factually correct. Yet another piece of bollox from the "team bus trashers"
Brendan110_0
Well-Known Member
But his face didn't land on 10,000 memes
Kinkys Left Foot
Well-Known Member
Written by a RAWK itk in a fever dream state no doubt.
Shows the utter ignorance of the general football fan of most other clubs in relation to what the charges most likely actually refer to, where they emanate from and the very real onus on the PL to provide sufficient evidence to satisfy the burden of proof whilst withstanding Citys likely substantial rebuttal evidence.
Also a lack of any real legal appreciation of the inherent difficulties of proving "fraud" on the scale alleged without the smoking gun, which most people with any substantive knowledge of the City case history have opined, the PL don't have.
Nobody confesses to a murder when there's no murder weapon, no body, they have a cast iron alibi corroborated by multiple others and the evidence presented against them is that a 10 year old email to their mum expressed an opinion that they didn't like them much.
Whatever enables them to sleep at night I suppose but it's all a bit sad and desperate.
Shows the utter ignorance of the general football fan of most other clubs in relation to what the charges most likely actually refer to, where they emanate from and the very real onus on the PL to provide sufficient evidence to satisfy the burden of proof whilst withstanding Citys likely substantial rebuttal evidence.
Also a lack of any real legal appreciation of the inherent difficulties of proving "fraud" on the scale alleged without the smoking gun, which most people with any substantive knowledge of the City case history have opined, the PL don't have.
Nobody confesses to a murder when there's no murder weapon, no body, they have a cast iron alibi corroborated by multiple others and the evidence presented against them is that a 10 year old email to their mum expressed an opinion that they didn't like them much.
Whatever enables them to sleep at night I suppose but it's all a bit sad and desperate.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
I've read some hilarious bullshit around our case but that one in particular takes the biscuit.
If only the author had canvassed the opinion of Wenger about our club - he actually speaks quite highly of City these days!