People keep saying this, to varying extremities.
But I just don't see how that can be the case, and I don't believe it.
To charge us to the extent they have, they Must have something to think they have enough and there is significant reaon there to do so.
That of course does not mean they are right, or their evidence/charges won't come undone and fall apart through the process and under rigourous challenge.
But I have never bought into this, they are just putting out what they can without any real thought or confidence in whether it has anything to it. Can't comprehend how that can be the case.