PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

So Everton and Forest have admitted they are guilty of one charge, and the media want us to be treated the same even though we have 115 charges and have pleaded not guilty?
It's like me shooting a man and killing him...

You getting a speeding ticket...

But everyone wants us both to get the same punishment.

It's hilarious the fact people feel like Everton are being treated harshly! They are cheating bastards, They have admitted that they are cheating bastards.

They deserve whatever punishment is put on front of them.
 
Anyone any idea as to.why the date for the hearing has to be a secret?

Not sure anyone has said it has to be secret?

My impression was Masters simply couldn't say because he had forgotten what the date was.

However, it would be best if the date was kept secret as the media will ramp up the pressure and try and influence the outcome.

I'm not convinced of the impartiality of this hearing. The PL will be seen as fools if we're exonerated and I think they'll be keen to at least have some of the charges stick.

I mean UEFA's hearing was supposed to be impartial yet they found us guilty with no evidence of any wrong doing.
 
It's like me shooting a man and killing him...

You getting a speeding ticket...

But everyone wants us both to get the same punishment.

It's hilarious the fact people feel like Everton are being treated harshly! They are cheating bastards, They have admitted that they are cheating bastards.

They deserve whatever punishment is put on front of them.
Not at all. The rules are complete bullshit to begin with.

It's like, one person shoots someone and another wears shoes but they both get done for murder.

Don't fall for it, the rules are fucked up, nobody deserves any sanctions providing they are not in debt.

How can one team be allowed to invest and another not be, but that is supposed to be a fair competition.
 
Brilliant thx for the explanation & the best article the athletic has written.

I suppose they didn’t mention in the CAS case for context no evidence of wrong doing.
The CAS case is not a direct parallel, because there are not only different standards but different legal thresholds for what could and could not be charged. The PL is, in some ways, more stringent.

The entire “utmost good faith” is hilarious when you consider this whole thing blew up because of illegally procured confidential internal emails, but then what does one expect anymore?!
 
Last edited:
Lol I been on another forum, it's fun. Apparently this blokes lives in Aldly Edge ( City players live there ) and he heard that City players are very worried about points deducted and relegation. The players are getting ready to leave !
same folks who predicted Pep would resign last season I imagine
 
Just a shame that the club can't come out and clarify a few points, but we've discussed this many times. I think it would take some heat off as well as boiling some piss against the real villans here.
 
The CAS case is not a direct parallel, because there are not only different standards but different legal thresholds for what could and could not be charged. The PL is, in some ways, more stringent.

The entire “utmost good faith” is Hilario’s when you consider this whole thing blew up because of illegally procured confidential internal emails, but then what does one expect anymore?!

It went to the trouble of explaining that FFP was set up to stop us yet couldn’t include that we were banned despite CAS finding no evidence of wrong doing.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.