reddishblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 1,325
Let me get this right. United are proposing to cut employment in the local area but City are the villains for investing in the community and creating jobs?
Let me get this right. United are proposing to cut employment in the local area but City are the villains for investing in the community and creating jobs?
Let me get this right. United are proposing to cut employment in the local area but City are the villains for investing in the community and creating jobs?
Originally Man U along with others ridiculed the Sheikh M takeover saying that football was a special sector that newcomer investment would not understand so would fail applying a traditional Business Plan.Scruffy Jim has brought in his favourite hatchet men at the swamp, and it looks like club staff will pay the price big time, sadly there are hundreds of redundancies on the way. Apparently he's twigged how shite the squad is, and the average cost of a half decent player being what ? £75m.
So all in all, they only need a new manager, a new training ground, a new stadium, a new squad, new PL rules that help them but stop other clubs competing and new investment partners.
No wonder he can't stop grovelling around Khaldoon, he's desperate to know how to run a world class football club.
![]()
Ratcliffe calls in restructuring consultants Interpath to slash costs at Old Trafford | TheBusinessDesk.com
Two stage review to look at supplier contracts and examine 1,112 staff numberswww.thebusinessdesk.com
More than that, they are cutting employment in their own company whilst asking for money from the government for a new stadium because it will boost employment .....
They are all over the fucking place.
That report states...
“Cost savings will help the club comply with FFP/PSR rules because there are limits on the losses clubs are allowed to make, and the more profitable a club is, the greater the headroom for investment in players,” a United insider is reported to have said to the Telegraph. “So reducing costs has a direct link to how much we can invest in the squad"
If that's the case and FFP/PSR is going to lead to hundreds of job losses then City's unsubstantiated 115 charges pale into insignificance.
The media should be all over that story rather than constantly gunning for City.
I'd love to see a copy of the consultant's report. There's this obnoxious, old bloke hanging around. We are paying him over £1m. He stinks of booze, is always interfering, and does not appear to add any value...Scruffy Jim has brought in his favourite hatchet men at the swamp, and it looks like club staff will pay the price big time, sadly there are hundreds of redundancies on the way. Apparently he's twigged how shite the squad is, and the average cost of a half decent player being what ? £75m.
So all in all, they only need a new manager, a new training ground, a new stadium, a new squad, new PL rules that help them but stop other clubs competing and new investment partners.
No wonder he can't stop grovelling around Khaldoon, he's desperate to know how to run a world class football club.
![]()
Ratcliffe calls in restructuring consultants Interpath to slash costs at Old Trafford | TheBusinessDesk.com
Two stage review to look at supplier contracts and examine 1,112 staff numberswww.thebusinessdesk.com
I'd love to see a copy of the consultant's report. There's this obnoxious, old bloke hanging around. We are paying him over £1m. He stinks of booze, is always interfering, and does not appear to add any value...