PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Yep - and I have I heard it right that Arsenal took on the task of drafting some of the PSR/APT regulations?

Could be that Masters has just been a sheep following orders and they have got complacent due to their (the cartel+1 and Masters) confidence that they can just get anything/everything voted through with the support of other clubs

It's clear that's these 4 clubs are responsible for this mess.
Isnt this what Americans do, take over companies and invade country's and leave them in a worse state than before once they have taken what they want
 
Need the independent regulator to be in place asap and to have the power to prevent the formation of / participation in and ESL by EPL clubs
Sadly, given the state of the currently independently regulated water, energy, education, health, environment and many other sectors, I think your assumption in a football regulator doing anything is a tad optimistic.
 
The Athletic? It may be many things, but it's not a "one man his dog social media operation'. It was bought a couple of years ago for over half a billion dollars, and they poached the chief football writers from a few of the national newspapers when they launched.

I would not be surprised if they're spending more money on football writing than anyone else in the UK, apart from the BBC.
If they are spending that much then it's fucking wasted.
 
Sadly, given the state of the currently independently regulated water, energy, education, health, environment and many other sectors, I think your assumption in a football regulator doing anything is a tad optimistic.
I understand / agree with that view

But without there being a regulator with the authority to prevent participation in an ESL - then I think that the cartel, with the other old G14 / ECA cartel clubs will get their way.

So - fingers crossed.
 
Be interesting to see their grounds of appeal, they lost on a point of law… no jurisdiction so really can’t see how they can reverse that. They look like an organisation that are really under pressure. Their response to the APT ruling was completely OTT.

These are the grounds they can appeal on:

1000000889.png
So it looks like:

The decision was one which could not reasonably have been reached by any appeal board which had applied it's mind properly to the facts of the case,

Or,

The decision was reached as a result of a perverse interpretation of the law.

With the IC appeal heard by two retired judges and a KC I can't imagine they have any chance of success. Or recovering any costs. Which is why no-one thought they would do it ....

Weird.
 
My sources, which are probably more reliable than theirs, tell me that Pep has been assured by the ownership that we have no case to answer. If he feels he's been lied to, then he'll be very angry and won't be staying any longer than necessary.
If only life were that simple. Whichever way the case goes, I'd like to think he trusts what he's been told.
 
Yet how do we know the PL have fully co-operated? All this mainstream bile about us being difficult. How do we know the PL haven't been doing the same when we have requested info from them.
The APT evidence proves the PL behaved unreasonably in that case. They wilfully obstructed us at every stage. Didn’t answer emails, refused to help us, dragged it out for months costing us tens of millions in sponsorships. They have leaked negative stories relentlessly in the 115 case. They have acted in bad faith from day one. None of this is in doubt.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.