I agree that everyone is entitled to another view but if a journalist writes something that he either knows or believes is totally fabricated then they need calling out..btw it's not a dig at you mate as I enjoy reading your input on here.They are entitled to have another view and to write it.
sadly so my friend!There are some inherent difficulties in tackling your final opinion.
I’d personally lump Mullock and Jack G to some extent in with Samuel tbh.For your own sake, never go into the media thread on here.
Any journalist that isn’t Martin Samuel is 100% anti-City and the rest of the thread is who can make the nastiest name for them.
If their view is based on facts!They are entitled to have another view and to write it.
Happy to add those to the friendly list.I’d personally lump Mullock and Jack G to some extent in with Samuel tbh.
Cant think of anyone else though, off the top of my head. John Cross has been balanced and fair in the past too.
AgreedHappy to add those to the friendly list.
It wouldn’t change the vibe of that thread much though.
Must be. Metal Guru says so.
True on results of case. But the "confidence" or nudge nudge wink winks, you don't think they're from the club?. Markmmmac said it was someone in the club, fbloke said CFG, Ahsan said "horse's mouth"
Of course people within the club are talking to people
and his last big hit was, 'wrap a yellow mini around the old oak tree', (no offence)Incidentally, I just found out yesterday that Marc Bolan was 5' 5". Who knew? No wonder he drove a Mini.
Yeah, but have you asked Conn whether he knows yet?For the record, if you ring up City's comms department (the number is publicly available), and ask if they've been given the verdict they will say "no we haven't". It doesn't require a nudge, a wink, or anything like that. It's not a state secret. Nobody is talking out of turn. It's literally a statement of fact.