PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Unless I’m missing something @The Shallyman quite clearly states he’s a LFC fan so not sure why people keep calling him a rag?
Correct, he is owed an apology from everyone who has called him a rag. He quite clearly states (on desktop anyway) that he is a murderer. So more respect for him please.
 
Good post. Surely the elite team of lawyers we have can prove our innocence without trying to throw our unquestionable political weight around so to me it’s worrying that we’re doing so.

I can’t wait for all of this to be over
Can you point out where AD or City are throwing their weight around? No?
 
You know what “doesn’t look very good”?

Scheduling a trophy parade on the anniversary of Heysel.

Throwing a glass full of coins at a teenage girl, hospitalising her.

Smashing up and spitting on everything in site, even when you’ve fucking won.

Players wearing Suarez t-shirts after he’s been done for racism.

Hacking IT systems.

Being ashamed of nothing, yet offended by everything.

Fuck off back to the Miseryside forums and enjoy Thursday night football you sad ****.
You missed off loads of other shit too to be fair
 
I have no recollection of mentioning Charlie.
Apologies my friend, must have been another poster on this forum.

According to that post our owner provided funds to allow a wind farm to be built on property owned by the then Prince of Wales.
 
I'm so angry with The Athletic I'm going to cancel my subscription!!

Oh, I've just remembered I don't pay for it..

It is very odd for them as they have been extremely cautious with articles about the ongoing charges and they haven't generally / ever opened comments (I don't bother reading it too often). The headline states that it has been discussed by the UK government and 'Abu Dhabi' but the article immediately states that the potential discussions were between our embassy and the FCO. It's very Daily Mail-ish and I suspect they are struggling for subscribers so therefore moving into sensationalism rather than wordy, tedious pieces as before.
 
Apologies my friend, must have been another poster on this forum.

According to that post our owner provided funds to allow a wind farm to be built on property owned by the then Prince of Wales.
AbuDhabi companies have funded and managed construction of 3 offshore wind farms. The crown owns the seabed up to the limit. So the crown gets rent and Charlie gets a proportion of the Crown income. I guess that is what a slightly confused poster was alluding to.
 
The American owned clubs along with the British press/media have brain washed those fans.
I know it cant be true ( lol ) but are these fans really that naive to think this wouldnt get discussed at a high level ?

As others have pointed out a British business ( PL ) run by Americans has accused a member of AD of being a crook.

Our top people are also very high up in AD dealing in multi billion deals around the world with different countries.

The American run PL has decided to try and ruin these people good name within the multi billion world they operate in.

I would have thought AD would have had discussions about this with many different countries. Most countries wouldnt want to do business with AD if they cook the books.

This is far bigger than those knobheads at the PL understood.

Football is tribal and it seems alot of rival fans are blind to the officious. Do they think that the prince of AD is a crook.

American owners are a huge threat to our football and it needs stopping.

Why dont the press/media ask questions when at club sponsored by Emirates win the cup also sponsored by Emirates ? Remember the dodge semi final when City were screwed over so arsenal got to the final.
 
Last edited:
Sorry pal, you're very naive. Newcastle are state owned it's not an argument. City aren't, if you can't see the difference between the two ownership models then I don't know what to say. As for last resort, are you joking? The PL are trying to destroy Manchester City, and the name of it's owner. Wake up and smell the fucking grass mate, you're living in cuckoo land.

I can see the difference though? That’s exactly what I just said, the Newcastle one is clearly state owned and shouldn’t be allowed.

My point is that it diplomatic channels are inevitably going to be used then to all purposes, it doesn’t make a difference.

Like I also said, in the world where there is complete distrust in the PL then I get it. Neither of them are good things though.
 
So The Pathletic accuse us of being state owned.

Which we're not.

But if we were, then clearly a company owned by the Abu Dhabi State being charged by a UK organisation of cheating would be a major diplomatic issue.

So why are The Pathletic amazed that this is being discussed at embassy level?

Because secretly they know that we're NOT state owned.

Can't have it both ways.
 
AbuDhabi companies have funded and managed construction of 3 offshore wind farms. The crown owns the seabed up to the limit. So the crown gets rent and Charlie gets a proportion of the Crown income. I guess that is what a slightly confused poster was alluding to.
Thanks for clarification KS.
 
Reading all the comments on here - loads saying it's a bad look if we've gone political and gone to the government...

...do we know that's the case – or is it that the British Government who have approached Abu Dhabi, shitting themselves that this may jepordise any multi-billion business dealings?
 
You know what “doesn’t look very good”?

Scheduling a trophy parade on the anniversary of Heysel.

Throwing a glass full of coins at a teenage girl, hospitalising her.

Smashing up and spitting on everything in site, even when you’ve fucking won.

Players wearing Suarez t-shirts after he’s been done for racism.

Hacking IT systems.

Being ashamed of nothing, yet offended by everything.

Fuck off back to the Miseryside forums and enjoy Thursday night football you sad ****.
Joe Corrigan likes this post (but would have appreciated a quick mention).
 
It should be added to their usernames so nobody is in any doubt. Seriously though some of us, myself included, will have missed the post(s) where he's said he's dipper. I just call them redshirts now to be on the safe side as that covers 99% of them.
its on his user name , team supported :gaa mayo(lfc)
 
Reading all the comments on here - loads saying it's a bad look if we've gone political and gone to the government...

...do we know that's the case – or is it that the British Government who have approached Abu Dhabi, shitting themselves that this may jepordise any multi-billion business dealings?

Personally I dont think it's a bad look. What it shows is the American run PL thought it was a big player in the world.

This just shows Citys owner plays in alot bigger world.

Plus if you are being accused of cooking the books you would use your friends in high places. It's what the Americans are doing.
 
Good to see them getting in early on the 'government leans on FA to drop charges' angle. Might mean a few keep looking away from the actual evidence for a bit longer.

Maybe it's dawning on them what a cock up this is. Lack of evidence, hugely serious and even potentially criminal charges, what evidence they do have is demonstrably illegally obtained and manipulated by a now convicted criminal, a sanctioning body headed by competitors accusing the one member that keeps winning things to the detriment of their own positions (can you say 'cartel'?), evidence of this collusion openly available, and of course even throwing the flimsy accusatory net over members of a royal family who also own significant interests and investments in and around the UK.

Go on FA, keep digging. I'm sure it will all work out very well in a court of law. Just ask Rui Pinto, after all it's his evidence this is based on, I'm sure he'll tell you all about being found guilty of "illegitimate access" and "correspondence violations" by the Portuguese court of law.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top