PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[eastmanc]

If it’s a few of us remembering, it either true or illusory truth effect?

No I'm pretty sure that it's true.

 

[moomba]

Not everything has to be online but your entire argument for it being real was that someone posted it on the forum...

I simply don't believe that if this was true it didn't appear in any of the reporting about Mancini when he joined, or any of the reporting around the der spiegel leaks - Mancini already working for Al Jazira would be a major part of that story.

I remember it reported at the time.

 

[meltonblue]

No I'm pretty sure that it's true.

I really doubt it as there was a bit of a furore at the time of how long we’d been courting Mancini. He himself then said he’d had his very first contact with both Khaldoon and Mansour two weeks before he signed the contract with us.

 

[Maly]

No I'm pretty sure that it's true.

So am I, but I can’t find any mention of it anywhere, hence me questioning myself

 

[slbsn]

Surely it shouldn’t matter what City or Liverpool think, did or agreed?
It’s against PL rules so they should enforce it.

In theory but it shows there was no real loss or damage which is not a great starting point for a PL investigation

 

[Impeccable One]

Noted with interest the PL first proposed to Everton a 6 point penalty plus 1 point for every 5m over spent = 10 points. This was rejected and the panel then came back with a straight 10 point penalty WTF ?

Anyone on here like to take a stab at would could be claimed as the total of financial ‘irregularities’ should all claims be proven against us ?

We could then divide by 5 and add 6 for the potential maximum point deduction

 

[Eoiyflem]

It sounds more like someone has been sharing a key for their house in order for others to take stuff out (with permission) but has then assumed the same people wouldn’t do the same when their permission was revoked. The question being, were the people told their permission was revoked?

Wtf are you on about?

 

[manimanc]

Don't know about you lot but there will be some tasty derbies when we get dumped in here.
Fuckin bring it on I say.

 

[I'm Blue]

In theory but it shows there was no real loss or damage which is not a great starting point for a PL investigation

No loss or damage maybe but surely it’s a sporting advantage or some other charge?
Bringing the game into disrepute, behaving like cunts towards a fellow PL member, there must be something.
It’s criminal which should surely be against a rule.

 

[slbsn]

No loss or damage maybe but surely it’s a sporting advantage or some other charge?
Bringing the game into disrepute, behaving like cunts towards a fellow PL member, there must be something.
It’s criminal which should surely be against a rule.

I'm not suggesting you couldn't, at the time, have found a breach of a rule. Of course, you could. I am saying that a) it was ages ago b) it was not a big deal otherwise City wouldn't have settled.