PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I read last month(20th anniversary article) that they chose the name Etihad, as a translation of Unity. I'm guessing that's come from the UAE's PR since they first launched in 2003 because having checked recently, it looks like it's been on the wiki for some time too. There are multiple interpretations but since the source itself has provided their intended interpretation, there's no need to debate it or listen to any people trolling City fans on twitter (if that's what they are doing?).

edit: Oh I see others have beat me to it.

It's meant to represent the coming together of the 7 Emirates. The long term goal is to make Etihad recognised globally(since over there it already has been designated that title, so it kind of is) as the national flag carrier of the UAE, not just Abu Dhabi's airline. Makes you think about some of the western press' attitudes towards the sponsorship deals and the comments they make. You'd almost think it was some shell company set up in 2008, just to funnel money into City.
 
Last edited:
Whats the transliteration of United Arab Emirates?
I'm guessing if "Etihad" isn't in the result then it doesnt translate as united.
Yes?

Who cares?
 
Can anyone recommend an article which summarises both the accusations and the related rules which we allegedly have broken? There are some excellent and well informed tweets from @slbsn amongst others - but lots of wild speculation too - and I'd like to understand the core challenges without reading all 3,500 pages on this thread!
Thanks in advance
 
kippaxed54 said:
Can anyone recommend an article which summarises both the accusations and the related rules which we allegedly have broken? There are some excellent and well informed tweets from @slbsn amongst others - but lots of wild speculation too - and I'd like to understand the core challenges without reading all 3,500 pages on this thread!
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Dont be lazy, the rest of us have had to read it all
 
kippaxed54 said:
Can anyone recommend an article which summarises both the accusations and the related rules which we allegedly have broken? There are some excellent and well informed tweets from @slbsn amongst others - but lots of wild speculation too - and I'd like to understand the core challenges without reading all 3,500 pages on this thread!
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
The rule we have broken that has been hit with a large hammer and fragmented into 115 alleged breaches of said rule is;
Rule Number 1,
Stopping the red shirts from winning anything on a regular basis and bringing their greedy self preservation cartel to a shuddering halt.
Hope that helps;-)
 
kippaxed54 said:
Can anyone recommend an article which summarises both the accusations and the related rules which we allegedly have broken? There are some excellent and well informed tweets from @slbsn amongst others - but lots of wild speculation too - and I'd like to understand the core challenges without reading all 3,500 pages on this thread!
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
open.substack.com

Conspiracy Theories and Innuendo will not prove the alleged Manchester City Conspiracy

There will be no Super Sub for cogent evidence
open.substack.com open.substack.com
www.dailymail.co.uk

STEFAN BORSON: Premier League in unenviable spot in City legal battles

Manchester City's seemingly never-ending battle with the football authorities over matters of accounting are so esoteric you wonder who's interested.
www.dailymail.co.uk
www.irishexaminer.com

Ian Mallon: Premier League prosecution of City looks a little naive

So far we can only speculate as to what the Premier League’s case centres on, although it has deliberately obfuscated by issuing vague references to stated rules it says were breached.
www.irishexaminer.com www.irishexaminer.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top