Gone for a Burton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2022
- Messages
- 4,497
- Team supported
- City
Does this include bonuses ?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Hard to understand your point(s). You are fixated on irrelevant semantics and the absence of public statements. As I said earlier, read the FAQ.Sorry, but in my opinion you're perpetuating the hyperbole being spread by the Red Top Mafia & Spuds, & their client media by not highlighting the several inarguable fundamentals that will kill these breaches dead.
Finally we're getting to the crux of these matters. UEFA all but accused us of industrial scale fraud, so why've they never used the word in relation to City?
It was circa 2014 that a Manchester City Executive mentioned the word "fraud" in that interview. Evidently City were trying to draw UEFA's fire imo, but UEFA didn't bite.
Now explain to me why neither UEFA nor the Premier League have ever responded to that "fraud" comment or used the word "fraud" in relation to City since 2014 to my knowledge?
Also, you claimed the PL said City were facing "115 charges". Can you provide a link to where they said this, as I was unable to find it before or since our exchange.
Stefan, have you lost the talksport gig, some other guy on today?Hard to understand your point(s). You are fixated on irrelevant semantics and the absence of public statements. As I said earlier, read the FAQ.
Have you upset Simon ? ;)
Because we have not told them what they want to hear ....maybe?If we’ve provided irrefutable evidence how can we have not co-operated?
eastmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 8,115
- Team supported
- Manchester city
He has always come across as extremely jealous of the way City's owners have ran the club since the takeover.He thinks owners should be allowed to invest in their teams but not city though for some reason
Last edited:
Agree with Dribble, in as far as the Premier League have only ever said in their statement that City breached Premier League Rules. Never anywhere did they refer to charges or being charged. Another one dreamed up by the media fuckwits.Hard to understand your point(s). You are fixated on irrelevant semantics and the absence of public statements. As I said earlier, read the FAQ.
Does this include bonuses ?
Yes and all staff wages to
Even ex managers paid off the books?Yes and all staff wages to
The club tried to have the PLs investigation moved to Commercial Court and failed..I said many years ago when this shite first got going that we should have challenged this bollocks in the courts.
You can’t just ‘challenge in court’ if the court says it doesn’t have jurisdiction.
That wasn't what the case tried to do. But you can't move it to the High Court just because you prefer it.The club tried to have the PLs investigation moved to Commercial Court and failed..
You can’t just ‘challenge in court’ if the court says it doesn’t have jurisdiction.