Citizen of Legoland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 12,043
How now is soon?SOON
I think it was Pep that brought those charges everyone else seemed to love it!Charge 342: performing a rabona during a premier league game
Charge 343: scoring from a rabona during a premier league game
You think they are going away once the result is out?I hear you
I just don’t want to spend the rest of my days having to stick up for City. I don’t want to constantly hear subtle digs in the media and not so subtle digs on social media
I know some say smile and move on but it wears you down over time
I want City’s name completely cleared once and for all to put an end to this shite
TBF if we're not cleared most Blues will claim corruption.You think they are going away once the result is out?
It's going to get even worse. If we are cleared it will be wall to wall coverage of how City paid them off, if we get a 100pt reduction and end up relegated it will be the biggest news story in the history of football and will be wall to wall coverage all season until we are gone and then even more so when we are fighting our way back in next year.
if anyone tries to have a dig at you as fan, you laugh in their face. They know less about these charges than we do.
Never played live.Well I wonder.
I'm sure Liverpool are desperate for the results to be issued now to deflect away from Salah's tantrum.
He"s "walked like an Egyptian " that lad.I'm sure Liverpool are desperate for the results to be issued now to deflect away from Salah's tantrum.
If the Premier League were so convinced it was a slam dunk case, I'd argue the longer it has gone on, the better.No news is good news, but tbh jokes aside its not a good sign for us. The red cartel are waiting in anticipation to rub their dirty hands in glee.
Is the vibe from the club still as positive / optimistic or has the absence of a verdict left people a little less bullish, presuming you have more of the inside track than herberts like me?If the Premier League were so convinced it was a slam dunk case, I'd argue the longer it has gone on, the better.
Certainly a slam dunk doesn't take a year to conclude.
As recently evidenced by the coach and horses City ran through these idiots over sponsorships, we are not dealing with geniuses.
I can see a rule change a coming!Charge 342: performing a rabona during a premier league game
Charge 343: scoring from a rabona during a premier league game
whilst I live in eternal hope of City being cleared of all charges, isn't the opposite also true, if our evidence against these charges was 'irrefutable' then why are the panel still going through itIf the Premier League were so convinced it was a slam dunk case, I'd argue the longer it has gone on, the better.
Certainly a slam dunk doesn't take a year to conclude.
As recently evidenced by the coach and horses City ran through these idiots over sponsorships, we are not dealing with geniuses.
That sounds Dylanesque.I can see a rule change a coming!
I dont think they are - I think the current delay is the extended conversation going on between the PL and our team about how the PL will back out of this without City sueing the arse off them and the other 19 sides and anyone else (looking at you goldshite and you spit the dog carragher) who has been spouting off about our alleged guilt! We've won this people!whilst I live in eternal hope of City being cleared of all charges, isn't the opposite also true, if our evidence against these charges was 'irrefutable' then why are the panel still going through it
lets hope soI dont think they are - I think the current delay is the extended conversation going on between the PL and our team about how the PL will back out of this without City sueing the arse off them and the other 19 sides and anyone else (looking at you goldshite and you spit the dog carragher) who has been spouting off about our alleged guilt! We've won this people!
With such unbounded optimism, may I suggest the match day thread may be for you ;)whilst I live in eternal hope of City being cleared of all charges, isn't the opposite also true, if our evidence against these charges was 'irrefutable' then why are the panel still going through it