Players we have no link to,but might improve us?

Discussion in 'Transfer forum' started by FantasyIreland, 23 Nov 2014.

  1. catalyst

    catalyst

    Joined:
    24 Jul 2017
    Messages:
    381
    Bring Alves and only play him in CL games because he's full of pashun!

     
  2. Tevez City

    Tevez City

    Joined:
    9 May 2010
    Messages:
    9,540
  3. bondsman

    bondsman

    Joined:
    10 Nov 2008
    Messages:
    4,399
    Out with his achilles mate I’d want to see how he recovered
     
  4. Thenumber1blue

    Thenumber1blue

    Joined:
    19 Apr 2009
    Messages:
    5,203
    If he was still great surely PSG would give him a new contract and do you honestly think Pep would go back for him after what he did ??
     
    Last edited: 24 Jun 2019
    Parisian likes this.
  5. Dr Jacoby

    Dr Jacoby

    Joined:
    18 Mar 2013
    Messages:
    4,316
    Jason Denayer
     
  6. catalyst

    catalyst

    Joined:
    24 Jul 2017
    Messages:
    381
    Great shout tbh, would take him back
     
  7. birchwoodgingerste

    birchwoodgingerste

    Joined:
    7 Apr 2010
    Messages:
    6,896
    Location:
    sankey bridges warrington
    Poor mans vvd!
     
  8. catalyst

    catalyst

    Joined:
    24 Jul 2017
    Messages:
    381
    Sounds good
     
  9. jamesha

    jamesha

    Joined:
    15 Apr 2013
    Messages:
    1,042
    It baffles me how our management did not see VVD playing alongside Denayer when they were both at Celtic and decide to take a punt.

    It would not have cost much and would have been a far better option than buying Mangala for the crazy money we did.

    Re. Jason it seems that he is doing well in France and fianlly living up to his potential. Cannot see him coming back to City but he would be a good signing for a mid-table Premier League team.
     
    Tevez City likes this.
  10. KCblue

    KCblue

    Joined:
    20 Apr 2015
    Messages:
    5,100
    Location:
    in goal
    Tbh I think he'd be an improvement on what United and Arsenal have.
     

Share This Page