Spurs (A)Only 7 to go
Spurs (A)Only 7 to go
But in its current state it is still open to manipulation. If the rags are in with a shout of winning the league and the derby fixture is part of the run in I wouldn't be convinced it would be that impartial. Or Liverpool as well.
So we had many more decisions in our favour than against. Thought so!Spurs (A)
Palace (H) Jesus' goal was ruled out by VAR by slimmest of margins we lost 2-0So we had many more decisions in our favour than against. Thought so!
And we'd have missed out on the Gundogan festivus and the Etihad choir belting out the Gerrard songSterling (yep got it wrong) wasn't so lucky in the title decider vs Liverpool. We won that game and it would of been a near enough stress free run title run in.
I'd rather we won it in the less stressful way possible. Sterling's goal would of given us a bit of breathing spaceAnd we'd have missed out on the Gundogan festivus and the Etihad choir belting out the Gerrard song
It was offside. So not incorrect, unlike all the initial calls that VAR corrected for usPalace (H) Jesus' goal was ruled out by VAR by slimmest of margins we lost 2-0
You could argue Rashford's goal was but that was given. I will leave it at that as we are going around in circles.It was offside. So not incorrect
This article is horseshit. They have conveniently missed out the Sterling disallowed goal against the Scousers that resulted in a 3 point swing. And unlike the others, that VAR decision wasnt even correctTake the emotion out of it and look at facts. We loose the title last season without it. Simple
The big winners without VAR
Liverpool
Premier League without VAR: The winners and losers
Fans always argue about which Premier League teams get the better of the VAR decisions, and this season we aim to find the definitive answer.www.espn.co.uk
It was pretty tight but on. Given initially anyway, so your point is mootYou could argue Rashford's goal was but that was given. I will leave it at that as we are going around in circles.