Perhaps they should have watched their team's performance rather than trolling on here. Seeing as how their ream was shit today.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Premier League Games 25/26/27 August '18
- Thread starter kaz7
- Start date
He's a Dipper or Rag. I've stopped feeding the troll.Favourites for what? The hysteria after a draw away to Wolves is a credit to the good ship flappy and the flappers on board.
franksinatra
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 10,671
No:
http://www.espnluckindex.com/methodology/
That was nothing to do with the bath paper it was exactly as I said a study done last season by the university of bath paid for by ESPN... it could be that they did two studies last year but if you can't provide a source(I've provided mine) as I asked I'm going to assume you have you're facts wrong and read the whole post please.
Even if it is a different study, if the decisions are correct what does it have to do with bias?(nothing) Does that rule out plenty of penalties incorrectly not given?(no) A better indication would be the ratio of penalties all the teams were given to the amount they should have been given. Again this is why you providing a source would be helpful so we don't have to take your word for it.
I know the pens had anything to do with Bath never said it was. I wuoted to sources of data for bluebybirth to view. You can go on any penalty/soccer stats website to view that data.
The blue phantom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 8,743
If they play like that a few more times they will come a cropper.
Brighton had the best of the second half and should have got something from that game.
Come on the dippers were not at their best but still had so many chances to score, I only remember that one clear chance late on for Brighton. It's like when folk say Wolves deserved a draw, only by luck they got one.
Kokonut1307
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2013
- Messages
- 1,650
You certainly have very high standards. It wasn't good, mind.
I want this team to at least match the dominance of the likes of Barca, Bayern and Real. However, performances like today show that there is still a lot of areas where we need to improve. So essentially yeah I have very high standards for City.
meeesh
Well-Known Member
Thought the presentation was today and victory parade Bank Holiday Monday?
Been delayed a week,not finished the bus just yet,needs reinforced windows just in case,it's nasty when they go down that street remember
So did we. How many times did we hit the woodwork again?Come on the dippers were not at their best but still had so many chances to score, I only remember that one clear chance late on for Brighton. It's like when folk say Wolves deserved a draw, only by luck they got one.
meeesh
Well-Known Member
Come on the dippers were not at their best but still had so many chances to score, I only remember that one clear chance late on for Brighton. It's like when folk say Wolves deserved a draw, only by luck they got one.
Yea,but if that goes in it's a draw,and that is certainly 2 points dropped,I didn't see many chances neither,although I did miss the first 30 mins
80s Shorts
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,616
The 8 year related to penalties for and against not the Bath paper which you have referred too.
Can I ask why you think it was a marketing piece for Liverpool besides the fact it found in favour of Liverpool being considered the unluckiest. Not sure why you think a professor with a worldwide reputation would risk his reputation by skewing a research paper to favour Pool. That nust sounds like blue moon perceived injustices again.
Can you not keep all this to the agenda thread ?
Do you ever talk football ?