The improvement after getting rid of Kane is puzzling. Dier, though? The guy is shit. He couldn't mark a letter box (you might call them a mail box).
I notice you agreed with my opinion on Dier!If we still had Kane we would be even better.
Some of the reasons for improvement rather than what people say
1) A declining Hugo replaced by a better Vicario
2) A young energetic Udogie now in place of an average Seesengon/Ben Davies
3) VDV partnering Romero instead of useless Dier
4) Bissouma and Sarr in midfield instead of Pierre/Skipp
5) Maddison
6) A manager who allows us to play football for the first time in 5 years
We still need a striker unless Veliz can do the business
All good points. I couldn’t believe so many Managers (including the useless Southgate) had Dier as first choice in their teams. Truly s..t player.If we still had Kane we would be even better.
Some of the reasons for improvement rather than what people say
1) A declining Hugo replaced by a better Vicario
2) A young energetic Udogie now in place of an average Seesengon/Ben Davies
3) VDV partnering Romero instead of useless Dier
4) Bissouma and Sarr in midfield instead of Pierre/Skipp
5) Maddison
6) A manager who allows us to play football for the first time in 5 years
We still need a striker unless Veliz can do the business
If we still had Kane we would be even better.
Some of the reasons for improvement rather than what people say
1) A declining Hugo replaced by a better Vicario
2) A young energetic Udogie now in place of an average Seesengon/Ben Davies
3) VDV partnering Romero instead of useless Dier
4) Bissouma and Sarr in midfield instead of Pierre/Skipp
5) Maddison
6) A manager who allows us to play football for the first time in 5 years
We still need a striker unless Veliz can do the business