B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Why cant they just do it on who should have won morally or who had the best net spend etc?
We had the best net spend last year so net spend is no longer cool.Why cant they just do it on who should have won morally or who had the best net spend etc?
We had the best net spend last year so net spend is no longer cool.
what about goal average?Not sure the first part is quite right.
The article I read said that the head-to-head ruling only comes into play if points, goal difference, AND goals scored are all the same. So goals scored still comes first.
Previously there would have been a play-off, but now they'll use head-to-head records to separate them. If the head-to-records are the same, they then go to away goals. If they still can't be separated, the play-off takes place.
However, I read all this in the Mail, so there's every chance that it's them who's got it wrong!
what about goal average?
Total number of goals scored would have been looked at before the head to head, we scored 95 they scored 89 so it wouldn't have needed to go to head to head.If we'd have finished on the same points and GD as Liverpool last season then we'd have won on head to head (0-0, 2-1)
I know, I'm talking about a scenario where everything finished equal and it came down to head to head, then away goals would become the deciding factor because it was two draws.But would also have won on pts.
We’d have won on goals scored, which is still a factor after points and GD. Only if clubs are tied after those 3 things will the head-to-head rule kick in.
You are both correct. It's decided in this order:Total number of goals scored would have been looked at before the head to head, we scored 95 they scored 89 so it wouldn't have needed to go to head to head.