Observer has a centre-page feature covering UEFA's concern over the size of the Premiership playing squads.
The paper had a chart which detailed each club's 1st team squad size. Doesn't appear on-line.
Anyway what I found surprising was that City had one of the smaller squad's in the Premiership. We had something like 35 1st team players whereas the big 4 had in excess of 50. Villa had something like 45. We were in the bottom 6, whereas Villa were around 6th
We are constantly being told that City are uner-achieving and what a great job Villa are doing with their small playing squad.
Maybe the source of this data is questionnable - we might not be comparing like with like, but Citys new found wealth does not win football matches, it's well trained, quality players, and it takes time to build such a squad.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/mar/29/uefa-liverpool-squad-sizes-premier-league
The paper had a chart which detailed each club's 1st team squad size. Doesn't appear on-line.
Anyway what I found surprising was that City had one of the smaller squad's in the Premiership. We had something like 35 1st team players whereas the big 4 had in excess of 50. Villa had something like 45. We were in the bottom 6, whereas Villa were around 6th
We are constantly being told that City are uner-achieving and what a great job Villa are doing with their small playing squad.
Maybe the source of this data is questionnable - we might not be comparing like with like, but Citys new found wealth does not win football matches, it's well trained, quality players, and it takes time to build such a squad.