Since this is the most prevalent post of your response I'll answer it.
The umbrella above all what you've said is an economic ideology in my opinion.
White Karl Briggs is not going to be bothered by Black Carl Brigs if his wealth is enough to allow his family not to struggle. Black Carl is not going to feel aggrieved at the notion that White Karl is living in a much nicer house if his family is in the same block, in the same neighbourhood with a similar priced house.
The politician that makes this happen negates the 'good vs evil', 'democracy and fascism' and 'independent judges versus political placements' nonsense that is a diversification from the problem of neoliberalism.
Neoliberalism is a system designed to disenfranchise demographics as you've noted in your 'versus' point. A politician cannot be a neolib AND serve the people. It's just not how the system works.
It's just easier to divide and blame and by doing so, the system takes a back seat and watches the ensuing chaos raking in money for the billionaires as a result.
You can look at almost anything to see the result of exploitation of this in real time.
*At this point I've just realised that I go down the route I want to, I will become myopic in trying to show my point only to be greeted with "none of that matters", so I will just save my energy on an utterly pointless discussion.