President Joe Biden

Biggs, there is very few posters on this thread that come across as ‘Biden lovers’ - it’s literally just a simple case that ‘for the love of God no more Trump’ , I’m not sure why you can’t accept that rather than keep trying to justify your constant criticism of Biden

That opinion has changed in the last few days.

You can go back to the start of this thread to see the love in for the guy until the last few days. I don't have to make anything up.
 
Biggs, there is very few posters on this thread that come across as ‘Biden lovers’ - it’s literally just a simple case that ‘for the love of God no more Trump’ , I’m not sure why you can’t accept that rather than keep trying to justify your constant criticism of Biden

Because if he accepts that then he doesn’t “win”.

Guy acts more like a raging, victory-at-all-costs authoritarian capitalist in the marketplace of ideas than anyone else on the thread by a long way.

He’s demonstrated no empathy nor sympathy for those he purports to want to give a leg up that I’ve seen. His philosophy appears to me to be almost entirely about making “the establishment” and “corporations” “pay”. Even when some have demonstrated agreement with certain progressive principles, it’s not Simon-pure enough.

I don’t know that he’s even been to America nor met many if any Americans. You’re absolutely right about the general sentiment on the thread; we’ve all tried to reason with him — no one’s succeeded, and when we give up in failure and frustration it’s apparently because we’re too blind to “get” that Biden and Trump are effectively the same.

Four-fingered W, as we say over here (in America).
 
Last edited:
Biggs, there is very few posters on this thread that come across as ‘Biden lovers’ - it’s literally just a simple case that ‘for the love of God no more Trump’ , I’m not sure why you can’t accept that rather than keep trying to justify your constant criticism of Biden
Very true, there are zero Biden lovers on this thread and many have explained the above at length.
 
Since this is the most prevalent post of your response I'll answer it.

The umbrella above all what you've said is an economic ideology in my opinion.

White Karl Briggs is not going to be bothered by Black Carl Brigs if his wealth is enough to allow his family not to struggle. Black Carl is not going to feel aggrieved at the notion that White Karl is living in a much nicer house if his family is in the same block, in the same neighbourhood with a similar priced house.

The politician that makes this happen negates the 'good vs evil', 'democracy and fascism' and 'independent judges versus political placements' nonsense that is a diversification from the problem of neoliberalism.

Neoliberalism is a system designed to disenfranchise demographics as you've noted in your 'versus' point. A politician cannot be a neolib AND serve the people. It's just not how the system works.

It's just easier to divide and blame and by doing so, the system takes a back seat and watches the ensuing chaos raking in money for the billionaires as a result.

You can look at almost anything to see the result of exploitation of this in real time.

*At this point I've just realised that I go down the route I want to, I will become myopic in trying to show my point only to be greeted with "none of that matters", so I will just save my energy on an utterly pointless discussion.

And in this choice between two neoliberals, are you really not going to differentiate between the guy who is so old that he's lived through several different sorts of neoliberalism and the psychopathic fascist neoliberal?

I don't mind idealism, but you're not getting what you want in this election, so will you choose the guy who's helped the poor get medical care or the guy who will take it away?
 
Last edited:
Because if he accepts that then he doesn’t “win”.

Guy acts more like a raging, victory-at-all-costs authoritarian capitalist in the marketplace of ideas than anyone else on the thread by a long way.

He’s demonstrated no empathy nor sympathy for those he purports to want to give a leg up that I’ve seen. His philosophy appears to me to be almost entirely about making “the establishment” and “corporations” “pay”. Even when some have demonstrated agreement with certain progressive principles, it’s not Simon-pure enough.

I don’t know that he’s even been to America nor met many if any Americans. You’re absolutely right about the general sentiment on the thread; we’ve all tried to reason with him — no one’s succeeded, and when we give up in failure and frustration it’s apparently because we’re too blind to “get” that Biden and Trump are effectively the same.

Four-fingered W, as we say over here (in America).

Says the snowflake sensitive Wall St guy who can't use my name, nor actually come down from his Ivory Tower in his gated community to converse my points like a grown up.

Not even going to address your post content, but I will continue to call you out, cos I know you can STILL see my post.
 
This is PATENTLY false and a lie.

As I've said, you can see the truth from the start of the thread.
I suppose anything is possible when you live in your own world as you so obviously do.

You may as well be Trump, you’ve got the LYING AND CAPITALS down to a tee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cjn
so what if some do, he's a better option than Trump right ???????
As I’ve said 100 times before, I’d prefer to have no ailments, but I’d still rather have a cold than cancer. Only a fucking idiot would object to a cold and dig their heels in for cancer as they were annoyed that they can’t be ailment free.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.