President Joe Biden

Which argument exactly?

As for the pettiness with Foggy,. Yes you are right. It is. Please ignore it. Im.just calling out the hall moderator to moderate himself. And he doesn't like it.
Yes and ignoring my comment that you’ve made assertions you can’t back up. Or was it some sort of clever rhetorical paradoxing debating tool?
 
More dissapointment I need answers. Not questions.

Edit:
Let me show some good faith, maybe we can meet in the middle.... You are right, I was wrong. I don't know that every Republican in the Country supports those initiatives. Frankly, I'd assume it's almost guaranteed that some don't.

So there, Foggy wins. Dax loses. Not every Republican supports Improving school safety.

So go ahead, dissapoint me again. :)
My disappointment at your disappointing attempts to spell disappointment correctly is disappointingly predictable.
 
Carry on Joe. You’re doing a great job, in the face of the GOP being all-out whack-job cunts, who are insistent on destroying the fucking country and a couple of your ‘own’ senators who are on the same payroll as the GOP and are stopping you enacting anything meaningful.
 
I'm not saying one can. But clearly, it seems Biden and his team hopes that voters become a 1 issue voters (i.e. make it a central issue) on the issue of gun legislation.

This make sense, as they surely don't want voters voting on the economy, on inflation, gas prices, Immigration or foreign policy. As all those are losing positions for Biden.

Lots of things can be done. Every Republican supports funding schools to improve entry exit and lockdown technology. Adding Resource Officers. And training willing faculty to conceal carry. Many even support the moving of gun purchase from 18-21.
I asked what assertions were you referring to?
There you go although I suspect you were being disingenuous in asking me to remind you as Fog has already asked you to back them up with evidence and you’ve refused to do so as part of your tit for tat.
 
There you go although I suspect you were being disingenuous in asking me to remind you as Fog has already asked you to back them up with evidence and you’ve refused to do so as part of your tit for tat.
No I wasn't. I didn't know what claims you objected to. I did not want to assume you were playing Foggys games.

1) "But let's examine your quote:
I'm not saying one can. But clearly, it seems Biden and his team hopes that voters become a 1 issue voters (i.e. make it a central issue) on the issue of gun legislation.

This make sense, as they surely don't want voters voting on the economy, on inflation, gas prices, Immigration or foreign policy. As all those are losing positions for Biden."


the evidence for this was in the post it quoted... Where Biden's people asked that people make the gun issue 'A CENTRAL Issue.'

Let me know if there was something else specifically you found objectionable.

2) Lots of things can be done. Every Republican supports funding schools to improve entry exit and lockdown technology. Adding Resource Officers. And training willing faculty to conceal carry. Many even support the moving of gun purchase from 18-21.

Here, I'm going to guess you object to the word 'Every'. This by the way is a silly objection as it doesn't change my point. I already conceded that point to Foggy. It's a dumb question that was made for that purpose. Change 'Every', to Many, or Most.

Furthermore, that comment was a response to a post discussing how Republicans want to do anything. In the context of the question, the Republican who were being referenced were Republicans in Congress. My response also mirrored that obvious understanding. So Foggy asking a Dumb question about 'every Republican in the Country' is just that. A bad faith question. Hence why it got the response it did

Really the whole line of questioning was a part of the silliness between Foggy and I.
 
Phew!!! Thanks for agreeing. I was worried Foggy would ask me for evidence before you responded.

It was in fact true that I had no 'Factual evidence' of the claim when I made it. But I Inferred from prior experience of being consistently on the opposite side of your position that the statement was likely true. Perhaps, Foggy van learn something from this. Who knows.

Also, @west didsblue feel free to run a grammar and spelling check on my work. I genuinely do appreciate the corrections. I can often be really poor at spelling when I write.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.