B
B
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Prorogation - Judgment Day:10.30am Tuesday 24/9/19
- Thread starter George Hannah
- Start date
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
These questions have to be asked, why have we allowed Brexit to become so important that people are supporting a Prime Minister that besmirches the name of a murdered MP and dismisses the claims of another that she is receiving death threats as "humbug"
The same people support his unlawful prorogation of Parliament and also support his choice use of divisive language and dismiss claims he is acted immorally with a casual air and are now blaming Parliament for the impasse.
How has it come to this?
Why have we allowed this issue to become so toxic and all encompassing?
How will any future PM of any party hope to reconcile the split in our nation?
If we leave how will those who support remain be treated?
If we remain how will those who support leave be treated?
If we cannot sort out our own house how on earth can we go out into the world with any authority?
Do you genuinely fear for the future?
Are you happy with the way things are going?
Where will it end?
In what way has he besmirched Jo Cox name? I am not sure he has even brought her up? Seems like very low point scoring to me?
Do you think Boris does not get threats from the left daily?
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
In what way has he besmirched Jo Cox name? I am not sure he has even brought her up? Seems like very low point scoring to me?
Do you think Boris does not get threats from the left daily?
He didn't bring her up, Labour MP's did as they used her name and death to try and push their political point.
That is the truth of what happened last night in Parliament.
Dubai Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 15,241
Ha, yes, admittedly we've been here before!They could call it New Labour!
I wonder if it could work?
But I don't think they'd need to go anywhere near as centrist as Blair was to win now. Just compromise on some of the more extreme policies that will NEVER appeal to a broad section of voters.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Ha, yes, admittedly we've been here before!
But I don't think they'd need to go anywhere near as centrist as Blair was to win now. Just compromise on some of the more extreme policies that will NEVER appeal to a broad section of voters.
The country is largely centrist.
its why New Labour had the success it had.
TheRemainsOfTheDave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 6,491
I think we need to be careful not to suggest they intentionally did that as some sort of strategy (I hope not anyway). All sides were talking passionately and the discussion entered that territory.He didn't bring her up, Labour MP's did as they used her name and death to try and push their political point.
That is the truth of what happened last night in Parliament.
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
The country is largely centrist.
its why New Labour had the success it had.
Indeed even I voted for them
Dubai Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 15,241
Of course. But I appreciate the party's core support wouldn't want to move that far again. Fortunately for them, I don't think they'd need to. But they will have to move part of the way. Surely they must see that.The country is largely centrist.
its why New Labour had the success it had.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
I think we need to be careful not to suggest they intentionally did that as some sort of strategy (I hope not anyway). All sides were talking passionately and the discussion entered that territory.
Fair enough and happy to clarify my point.
They brought her into the debate.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Indeed even I voted for them
Most of us did, hence the record majorities.